Waymo illegal overtake into wrong-way driving
Incident and Immediate Reactions
- Waymo car crosses double yellow lines, passes a group of electric unicyclists, then continues in the oncoming lane for an extended distance.
- Commenters highlight not just the illegal overtake, but the car’s apparent inability to quickly “reset” to a safe, lawful position.
- Some find the scene surreal and darkly humorous: unicyclists surrounding a malfunctioning robotaxi to shepherd it back into the proper lane.
Possible Technical Explanations
- Speculation that:
- The car misclassified unicyclists as pedestrians or as being in a bike lane.
- The police car and crowd confused its lane model or intent prediction.
- The planner initiated an overtake and then failed to safely abort when conditions changed.
- Concern that the system seemed context-blind once in the wrong lane and only stopped when physically blocked.
Human vs. Autonomous Driving Standards
- Some argue humans routinely do equally stupid or worse things; perfection from AVs is unrealistic.
- Others counter that AVs are deployed at scale and should exceed even careful human drivers, especially by never making extended, obviously illegal maneuvers.
- Debate over whether it’s fair to compare cherry-picked human errors to rare AV failures.
Liability, Enforcement, and Ethics
- Questions raised about:
- What penalties should apply when an AV commits dangerous driving: grounding fleets, fines, criminal liability for executives?
- Whether remote human supervisors meaningfully improve safety or just add another failure mode.
- Some compare AV trials on public streets to human drug trials, with pushback about lack of consent from bystanders.
Road Design and “Training Society”
- Discussion of historical shifts like jaywalking laws and car-centric design as precedent for “making roads safe for cars.”
- Skepticism toward proposals to adapt laws and behavior around AV limitations instead of improving the technology or infrastructure.
Waymo’s Public Explanation
- Waymo’s statement that it was carefully passing a potential fallen rider and “stayed in the oncoming lane longer than necessary” is widely viewed as spin.
- Commenters see downplaying and omission of key details as a bad sign for safety culture and transparency.