Jeff Lawson buys The Onion
Overall reaction to the sale
- Many see the purchase as an “obvious” and fitting move for Lawson and are cautiously optimistic.
- Several view this as a positive alternative to typical billionaire projects: funding “public art” and weird, creative media instead of extractive ventures.
- The sale is welcomed partly because prior owner G/O Media is widely criticized as hollowing out properties; some express schadenfreude that The Onion is “finally free.”
Jeff Lawson, ownership structure, and plans
- Lawson’s background (tech founder, Midwestern roots) is discussed as context, with speculation that this may help keep operations in Chicago.
- A new company was formed shortly before the acquisition, suggesting a focused vehicle for owning The Onion; some think the CEO role won’t be time‑intensive.
- Lawson publicly framed the move as “unleashing” the writers and hinted at new products and mediums, including reviving Onion News Network video.
The Onion’s past vs. present
- Large nostalgia vein: print-era Madison/Harvard-Square papers, “Our Dumb Century,” the 9/11 issue, classic recurring bits (e.g., “Area Man,” T. Herman Zweibel) and many iconic headlines and ONN videos.
- Several argue The Onion peaked in earlier decades and has since entered a “Meh” era: more repetitive jokes, fewer risks, and less edge.
- Proposed causes: NYC→Chicago move that lost original writers, backlash over an offensive tweet about a child actor, funding/TV pivots, and video economics.
Political bias and “clapter”
- Some say the modern Onion is too moralizing and predictably left‑leaning, producing “clapter” (applause for shared beliefs) rather than surprising satire.
- Others counter that The Onion has always been political, that one party currently provides richer material, and that satire need not be “balanced.”
- Examples are cited both of hard-hitting recurring pieces (e.g., on mass shootings, Israel/Gaza) and of recent jokes targeting Democrats, suggesting mixed evidence on partisan skew.
Comparisons to other satire
- Multiple posters deride right‑leaning competitor The Babylon Bee as low‑quality and repetitive, with some accusing it of anti‑trans hostility.
- A minority defend specific Bee headlines and note its amicus brief in a parody-rights case, alongside The Onion’s widely praised brief.
New leadership and culture-war concerns
- The appointment of a well-known disinformation/culture reporter in the new structure divides opinion:
- Supporters think he “gets” internet culture and toxic communities.
- Critics fear The Onion will be used more explicitly as a culture-war tool and won’t return to the older, more unpredictable tone.
Archiving, infrastructure, and side issues
- Posters lament lost or hard-to-access legacy content (e.g., Flash-based “Guide to Actual Reality”) and Kinja-based hosting; some advocate for archiving and even scanning old print issues.
- There is brief concern about heavy use of sponsored articles on the front page.
- Side discussions touch on related properties (A.V. Club’s separate sale), satire history, and personal stories of discovering The Onion.