The Grateful Dead's Wall of Sound (2019)
Historical concert sound & the Wall of Sound
- Early rock shows often had amps behind players, blasting them with extreme SPL; front-of-house amplification emerged later.
- The Wall of Sound gave each instrument its own dedicated speaker stack and amplification path, aiming for clarity and long‑range coherence rather than brute loudness.
- Some posters recall hearing it in the 1970s and describe unusually clear, separated sound at moderate levels, even far from the stage.
Microphone techniques & feedback control
- A key innovation was the dual (sometimes described as triple) vocal mic setup with one mic phase‑inverted.
- Because the singer is close to only one capsule, the PA spill common to both mics largely cancels, reducing feedback.
- Posters compare this to balanced lines and modern noise‑cancelling (e.g., phones), and share similar cancellation hacks in venues.
Line arrays, beam steering, and modern PA practice
- The Wall’s vertical stacks anticipate modern line arrays, now standard at big shows and even in home “tower” speakers.
- Advantages discussed: reduced horizontal comb filtering, better coverage, and possibilities like beam steering and planar arrays.
- Meyer Sound and others are cited as commercializing many of these concepts; modern systems can auto‑tune via measurement bursts.
Recording, taping culture, and codecs
- The Dead encouraged audience taping, with dedicated taper sections near the soundboard.
- This sharing culture helped shape attitudes toward decentralized distribution, early online communities, and even lossless codecs (FLAC, Shorten) originating from taping circles.
- Posters reminisce about tape and DAT “trees” and describe Relisten and archive.org as today’s primary hubs for these recordings.
Counterculture, LSD, and finance
- The engineer who drove the Wall’s development was also a major LSD producer; illicit funds reportedly subsidized the massive PA.
- LSD and Bay Area counterculture are linked in the thread to early personal computing, The WELL, and digital‑rights activism.
Critiques and practical limitations
- Several note that touring the Wall was logistically and financially unsustainable, requiring multiple full systems and huge crews.
- Some argue vocals never sounded great due to the mic arrangement and performance issues.
- Others counter that, despite flaws, it was a pioneering experiment that laid groundwork for modern PA design.
Meta: article, UX, and side threads
- Commenters complain about the article’s verbosity, commas, and light‑gray text.
- Side discussions touch on alternative “walls of sound,” other engineers, extreme‑volume bands, and modern anti‑feedback products.