I love my wife. My wife is dead (1946)
A newly resurfaced 1946 letter from physicist Richard Feynman to his wife, written after her death, prompts reflections on enduring love, grief, and the ways people continue to “talk to” the dead. Commenters share personal experiences of losing spouses and parents, strategies for coping with bereavement, and how new relationships or deep friendships can (or cannot) fill the void left behind. The thread also probes ethical questions about publishing private letters posthumously and whether the wishes and privacy of the dead should continue to bind the living.
Emotional impact of the letter
- Many readers describe the letter as beautiful, moving, and painful in a meaningful way.
- Several say it prompted them to immediately express love or gratitude to their partners or family.
- Some single or less-experienced readers feel both envy and sadness at such deep love.
Grief, ongoing bonds, and talking to the dead
- Multiple commenters relate to writing or talking to deceased loved ones (parents, spouses, siblings) as a healthy way to remember and maintain a connection.
- Some explicitly reject the idea that this is pathological, framing it as introspection and enduring love.
- Others share how grief evolves: from intense pain to a quieter, persistent connection, sometimes resurfacing unexpectedly.
- A few note that time doesn’t “heal” so much as make the absence less constant in awareness.
Ethics of publishing private letters and papers
- One camp feels private, unpublished writings (letters, diaries) should generally remain private, especially if explicitly not intended for publication.
- Another argues that, after death, publishing can be ethically acceptable and historically valuable, revealing unfiltered humanity.
- Intermediate views suggest waiting until all closely involved parties have died, or limiting access to researchers.
- There is broader debate over whether a person’s privacy and wishes should still bind the living after death, with nuanced arguments on both sides.
Feynman’s personality, career, and behavior
- Commenters recall his wartime psych evaluation where talking to his late wife and to himself was pathologized, which some see as a misunderstanding of normal coping.
- His role in the Challenger investigation is highlighted, especially his insistence on prioritizing reality over public relations and not softening his conclusions.
- Some admire his intellectual passion (e.g., doing math constantly), while others mention his sexual promiscuity and problematic behavior (affairs, manipulative tactics) as ethically concerning.
Love, relationships, and sexuality after loss
- Widowed commenters describe the profound loss of emotional intimacy and the long process of rebuilding a support network.
- There’s discussion of seeking new partners after a spouse’s death:
- Some formerly saw it as a “betrayal” but came to view it as natural and even loving.
- Many emphasize that wanting surviving partners to find new love is an expression of unselfish love.
- Promiscuity itself is framed as morally neutral if all parties give informed consent; issues arise around deception and power imbalances.
- Some stress that casual relationships can’t fully substitute for deep, long-term bonds; others note they can still be meaningful in different ways.
Coping resources and cultural references
- Readers recommend works on grief and love (e.g., a grief memoir, a poetry anthology, a highly emotional album dealing with a spouse’s death, certain novels and games) as helpful reflections.
- Several describe personal strategies: fitness, building many close friendships, journaling or “messaging” the dead, and accepting varied emotional responses (including guilt over moments of happiness).
Friendship and adult social networks
- One widowed commenter reports eventually building about two dozen very close friends to partially fill the emotional gap.
- Others find that number astonishingly high and ask how; suggestions include prioritizing time, empathy, kindness, flexibility, and patience.
- Many note the difficulty of forming deep friendships in adulthood amid existing responsibilities.
Side discussions: medicine and data access
- A tangent explores accessing personal medical records; commenters state it’s a legal right and now often facilitated via portals.
- Another tangent covers obtaining antibiotics when doctors won’t prescribe them:
- Some recount self-sourcing or using animal-market antibiotics but strongly caution against inappropriate use due to resistance risks.
- Others note the temptation and danger of self-treating without clear diagnosis.
HN moderation and duplicate policy
- The post was flagged as a duplicate of prior discussions about the same letter.
- Some argue emotional, personal-story threads should be exempt from strict dupe rules, as each run surfaces new voices and experiences.
- Moderation ultimately relaxed the duplicate marker, which multiple commenters appreciate as a sensitive exception.