Amazon is bricking $2,350 Astro robots 10 months after release
Bricking & Refunds
- Astro for Business is being remotely disabled because its cloud backend is shutting down.
- Amazon is giving full refunds, an additional ~$300 in credits, and covering recycling/shipping.
- Some see this as a relatively fair outcome for a niche, failed, cloud‑dependent product.
- Others argue money doesn’t fully compensate for lost functionality, setup effort, or opportunity cost.
Trust, Reputation & Vendor Risk
- Many warn that you “only get a few” such shutdowns before earning a Google‑like reputation.
- Several say they already avoid new Amazon or Google products because of repeated cancellations.
- This particularly harms internal champions who pushed to adopt Astro; their political capital is burned.
Cloud Dependence, Ownership & E‑waste
- Root complaint: devices you “own” stop working when a vendor turns off servers.
- Some argue this should be illegal without opening devices/SDKs so others can keep them running.
- Others counter that full refunds plus recycling is an acceptable “ethical closure.”
- Concern about growing e‑waste and “bricked by design” hardware is recurring.
Business vs Consumer Impact
- Businesses face procurement overhead, staff training, and disruption to security workflows.
- Refunds don’t cover those sunk costs or the scramble to replace functionality.
- Even for consumers, people note lost time, accessories, and possibly worse/absent alternatives.
Use Cases & Product-Market Fit
- Multiple commenters struggle to see a compelling use; fixed cameras or Roombas seem better.
- Mobile security is seen as niche and technically fragile (stairs, getting stuck, easy to avoid).
- Broader point: general‑purpose home robots without a strong, specific job tend to flop.
Amazon’s Innovation Culture
- Some describe a pattern: splashy hardware bets (Fire Phone, Glow, Astro) that burn money and are later killed.
- Reports that Astro team members were laid off, which now chills internal risk‑taking.
- Per ex‑employees, Amazon’s “customer obsession” and “working backwards” processes can be applied loosely.
Comparisons & Alternatives
- Google is cited as the archetype of “ship, then kill” (Stadia, Firebase anxiety).
- Microsoft is contrasted as more stable for enterprise, though others point to its own killed products.
- A few suggest Amazon could blunt backlash by donating units to schools or enabling open‑source re‑use.