Show HN: Hanon Pro – piano technique and exercises for the digital age

A new iOS app, Hanon Pro, modernizes classic piano technique exercises by analyzing MIDI input and giving detailed feedback, prompting interest from learners who want data-driven practice and progress tracking. Commenters compare it with existing tools like Synthesia, Simply Piano, Soundslice and Melodics, debating trade‑offs between gamified learning, muscle‑memory–based approaches, and traditional sheet‑music literacy or in‑person teaching. Key themes include hardware recommendations for MIDI‑capable keyboards, concerns over platform limits (iOS 17+, MIDI-only input), and how much apps can realistically replace the “boring but essential” work of building solid piano technique.

Hardware / MIDI setup

  • Several people want clearer guidance on choosing a MIDI keyboard, ideally a simple “matrix” by price/size/features for beginners and kids.
  • Consensus that USB‑MIDI is ubiquitous; the more important choice is key feel: hammer‑action vs light keys, build quality, and noise.
  • Specific keyboards are discussed: portable digital pianos with good action and Bluetooth MIDI for app integration; cheaper light‑key boards with key lights for motivating kids; mid‑priced weighted options and MIDI controllers as good compromises.

Learning approaches & companion apps

  • Many pair hardware with learning apps: video‑based lesson platforms, gamified apps, and “falling notes” tools.
  • Gamified apps are praised for motivation, rhythm training, and building muscle memory, but criticized for weak notation and theory skills; some teachers report needing to “undo” years of app‑based habits.
  • Suggestions: use apps to spark passion, but deliberately practice reading sheet music and theory.

Hanon method and technique

  • Hanon exercises are described as a classic but controversial technique resource.
  • Critics argue the original instructions (high finger lifting) promote tension and bad technique; some use the exercises only as note patterns, with modern technique (weight transfer, relaxed hands).
  • Others defend Hanon as effective for finger strength and “grind,” but there’s disagreement on how many great pianists actually relied on it.
  • Alternatives mentioned: scales/arpeggios, etudes, other technique books, and ergonomics‑focused methods.

Feedback on Hanon Pro itself

  • Positive: concept is “fascinating,” MIDI‑based feedback and wrong‑note highlighting are appreciated; some users intend to adopt it as a regular practice tool and find pricing reasonable for curated scores.
  • Negative/requests:
    • Non‑MIDI users find it underwhelming and wish for microphone input.
    • Desire to import existing sheet music (e.g., children’s songs in other languages) and/or an open score format.
    • Strong demand for sectional practice: start from any bar, loop and evaluate small segments, slower tempo.
    • Requests for MIDI‑based audio playback so practice with headphones stays quiet.
  • App reportedly crashed with certain Bluetooth MIDI adapters; the developer says a fix is rolling out and acknowledges feature requests (including adding more composers).

Platform & ecosystem issues

  • Some are frustrated the app requires iOS 17+, especially for otherwise‑usable older iPads; others note this stems from reliance on newer SwiftUI/SwiftData APIs.
  • Brief debate about App Store price visibility; commenters generally agree pricing info is still shown, though UX can be confusing.
  • Appreciation for desktop Mac availability, with hopes for a more native Mac version and eventually other platforms; Vision Pro support is requested.

Role of teachers vs self‑guided learning

  • Parents wonder if this or similar apps can substitute for early lessons for children.
  • Several argue early in‑person instruction is important to prevent bad technique, with apps best used as supplements.
  • Others stress that passion and fun should come first, especially for kids; they value apps that feel like games and accept some imperfect technique initially.
  • Teachers are framed less as information sources and more as motivators, curators of repertoire, and correctors of subtle technical issues.

Progress tracking and “intelligent” features

  • Users value progress tracking and suggest richer analytics: automatic detection of practiced scales/chords, identifying gaps, progress over time, and smarter next‑piece recommendations.
  • There’s interest in more advanced features: automatic score segmentation, theory annotations linked to what’s being played, and even conversational feedback agents that “see” MIDI data.
  • One subthread discusses algorithms for following a player through a piece (with mistakes and repeats), suggesting MIDI plus probabilistic models (e.g., HMM‑like approaches) could make this feasible, though the math is nontrivial.

Broader reflections

  • Some see an unrealistic belief that apps can remove the “boring and hard” parts of piano; they argue that sight‑reading and muscle memory still require sustained grind.
  • Others report excellent results from modern, song‑first, gamified tools that focus on contemporary music rather than classical notation, saying this finally made learning click for them.