Asking the wrong questions (2017)

Predictions about technology often miss the mark not because they get specifics wrong, but because they focus on the wrong aspects of change. Commenters contrast mid‑20th‑century sci‑fi visions—rocket ships, flying cars, domestic gender roles—with today’s realities of advertising-driven computing, smartphones, and AI, arguing that social, economic, and infrastructural shifts matter more than flashy gadgets. The thread uses this lens to question current AI hype, future-of-work utopias, and transport fantasies, suggesting that true disruption usually appears in the mundane systems and incentives we fail to imagine.

Frequency Illusion & “New” Ideas

  • Several comments note the “frequency illusion” (Baader–Meinhof): once you learn about something (e.g., LLMs), you suddenly see it everywhere.
  • Some argue this is both perception bias and a real social effect: as more people learn about a topic, they talk about it, creating a chain reaction.

AI, LLMs, and the “Wrong Questions”

  • Debate over whether AI is a transformative platform like smartphones or just a fancy “fax machine” to be monetized with ads.
  • Skeptics highlight LLMs as uncontrollable black boxes, poor foundations for durable businesses, and more like a UI component (capacitive touchscreen, Pentium) than a full platform.
  • Others counter that “apps on top of search” already exist and that the real value may lie in better interfaces rather than direct chat.
  • Some see current “what if AI is the next smartphone?” framing as exactly the kind of wrong question the article criticizes.

Work, Gender, and Utopian Futures

  • Discussion around 1950s expectations that nobody would need to work vs. the reality of women seeking paid work.
  • Some emphasize work as meaningful and socially necessary, especially compared to unpaid domestic labor without autonomy.
  • Others point out that many rich people don’t need to work, and that the real issue is financial dependence and lack of options.

Science Fiction, Prediction, and Advertising

  • Repeated theme: classic sci-fi extrapolated rockets and robots but usually preserved contemporary social norms (male pilots, paper tickets, physical newspapers, cash).
  • Cyberpunk and certain dystopian works are praised for anticipating corporate power, surveillance, and tech-enabled inequality.
  • Many note that computing as a branch of advertising and pervasive surveillance capitalism were underpredicted or missed entirely, though a few earlier works gestured at it.
  • Overall consensus: sci-fi is more about present-day concerns and entertainment than accurate forecasting.

Infrastructure, Transport, and Urban Form

  • Commenters contrast 1950s visions of rebuilt roads, flying cars, and easy space travel with today’s slow infrastructure change and physical limits.
  • Discussion of self-driving-only highways quickly collapses into “that’s just trains/buses,” with arguments over density, public transit, e-bikes, and car-centric land use.
  • Some see better transit and denser cities as a solved-but-unimplemented problem; others doubt “sufficiently dense urbanization” will arrive where they live.

Energy, Fusion, and Suppressed Tech

  • One thread compares flying cars and fusion: energy and safety constraints make them unattractive versus solar.
  • Another commenter asserts cold fusion was effectively solved decades ago and then suppressed; others do not engage, leaving this claim unexamined.

Tax Systems and Automation

  • Clarification that “computerised taxation (except in the USA)” refers not to the IRS lacking computers, but to the US still requiring individuals to compile and file returns, often through third-party e-file services.

Time, Generations, and Change

  • Side discussion on long generational spans (grandparents born in the 19th century) as a way to appreciate how much technological and social change a single lifetime can span.

Knowledge Access and Its Possible Decline

  • Some worry the era of “pocket computers connected to all the world’s knowledge” may already be ebbing, citing declining search quality, threats to archival projects, and rising censorship.
  • Napster is mentioned as an earlier, brief moment of seemingly total access (to music) that ended quickly.