We accidentally burned through 200GB of proxy bandwidth in 6 hours

Proxy bandwidth pricing & infrastructure

  • Many are shocked by $500 for ~200 GB, noting standard cloud egress is around cents per GB, not dollars.
  • Commenters deduce the cost comes from residential rotating proxy providers, not normal cloud bandwidth.
  • Residential proxy prices cited: roughly $1–10/GB, consistent with the bill shown.
  • Some argue colocation and paying for committed throughput would be far cheaper, but others note that datacenter IP ranges are routinely blocked for scraping.

Residential proxies: sourcing and ethics

  • Multiple posts claim many residential proxies come from malware, shady “free VPNs,” compromised devices, and browser extensions, effectively forming botnets.
  • Others point to “ethical” models: users paid for bandwidth, or free apps/VPNs that clearly disclose proxy usage.
  • Skeptics counter that “ethical” claims are hard to verify, users often don’t understand the implications, and such use may violate ISP terms and harm IP reputation.
  • Debate over whether working directly with ISPs to host “ISP proxies” in datacenters is more acceptable.

Use cases and “sketchiness” debate

  • Some see residential proxies and CAPTCHA-solving as markers for a gray/black-hat ecosystem: ticket scalping, credential stuffing, spam, fraud.
  • Others defend legitimate automation: browser-based workflows where no API exists (e.g., CRM data entry, heavy travel booking, price comparison).
  • Disagreement on where the ethical line is, especially for bypassing CAPTCHAs or access controls that enforce paid APIs.

Managing dependencies & Chrome behavior

  • Several focus on the root cause: Chrome/Chromium silently downloading large updates/extensions, which on expensive proxies becomes costly.
  • Discussion about “hard dependencies” on Google: changes can have real financial impact with little notice.
  • Suggested mitigations: anomaly detection on proxy usage, documenting integration points, and planning for alternative stacks.

ISP terms, legal risk, and liability

  • Concern that residential proxy participants may violate ISP AUPs and risk throttling, bans, or even law-enforcement visits for traffic they didn’t originate.
  • One side argues responsibility lies with the end user who consented; another raises potential tortious interference and reputational damage to ISPs.

Broader ecosystem & reactions

  • Anticipation of an arms race: more residential proxy usage by AI/scrapers, and more aggressive countermeasures (e.g., serving huge files to suspected bots).
  • Frustration that the “open internet” is deteriorating due to abuse, CAPTCHAs, and IP blocking.
  • Some note the irony that consumers treat 200 GB as trivial for gaming, while in this context it costs hundreds of dollars.