ST Book, the Notebook Atari ST
Display tech, cursors, and usability
- Passive-matrix LCDs on early laptops smeared motion, making cursors hard to track and motivating features like mouse trails.
- Modern macOS is noted as lacking classic trails but offering a “shake to enlarge cursor” feature, which still isn’t ideal on large multi-monitor setups.
- Some users increase cursor size but find very large pointers imprecise.
- There’s a suggestion that platforms should define cursor size in physical units and offer options like dimming non-pointer areas or resetting cursor to a known screen position.
Atari ST, music, and live performance
- ST/ ST Book appealing for musicians due to built-in MIDI and reliable sequencing; associated with the shift from trackers to DAWs like Cubase and hardware like AKAI samplers.
- Discussion traces pre-MIDI computer-like sequencing (analog sequencers, drum machines, DIN Sync) through Fairlight/Synclavier to general-purpose computers on stage.
- Examples span synthpop setups on Apple II, Amiga demo/tracker scenes, Japanese FM-chip machines, and live rigs using multiple Ataris.
- Synclavier is highlighted as a powerful hybrid system whose workflow and sound justify modern emulations.
Industrial design and laptop form factors
- ST Book is praised as “beautiful,” with a taller aspect ratio and full-height keys seen as superior to modern island keyboards and widescreens.
- Others argue it clearly predates the PowerBook-era layout (keyboard pushed up, central pointing device, wrist rest).
- Large modern laptops create practical issues (bags, backpacks) but users still chase vertical screen space.
Keyboards, Delete vs Backspace, and power buttons
- Many prefer older laptop keyboards for feel and full key sets, especially having both Backspace and Delete.
- Apple’s omission of a dedicated forward-delete key on laptops is heavily criticized; some argue most users don’t care, others cite complaints from non-technical users.
- macOS Finder not mapping Delete to “move to trash” is called out as inefficient.
- Power-button placement on keyboards (replacing keys like End or Eject) is seen as risky or annoying, though some report no practical issues.
Atari Portfolio and portable coding
- Nostalgic references to using the Atari Portfolio with ATMs (popularized in media) and for serious work, including C coding and database recovery during travel.
- Despite the tiny text display, constrained editing was considered tolerable for specific tasks; some even wrote games entirely on-device.
- Hardware fragility and failure of surviving units is mentioned.
Alt-history: If Atari/Amiga had “won”
- Some imagine a more media-rich, playful, less beige computing ecosystem with Motorola CPUs dominant and Unix variants on Amiga/Atari hardware.
- Others doubt Amiga or Atari could have scaled: clone ecosystems drove PC progress, and neither company was clone-friendly.
- AmigaOS is praised for preemptive multitasking and Unix-influenced ideas but criticized as fundamentally weak for long-term, protected, multiuser evolution.
- Atari’s TOS/GEM plus MiNT/FreeMiNT is described as architecturally cleaner, with proper syscalls and Unix-like multitasking, and still maintained today.
- Debate over whether big-iron Unix would have dominated servers, or Linux would still emerge from frustration with proprietary Unix, remains unresolved.
Amiga/Atari product strategy and laptops
- ST Book is noted as a rare completed Atari notebook; some miss the classic ST styling and see more resemblance to the Portfolio.
- Commodore’s rumored Amiga laptop is said to have effectively become the A600, originating as a cheaper A300 concept with genlock.
- Management’s decision to discontinue the successful A500 in favor of the poorly selling A600 is described as baffling.
- Amiga’s strong reliance on color made laptop adaptation harder than the ST’s monochrome-focused ecosystem.
- Side discussion covers non-Atari Unix laptops (SGI prototypes, military remakes of Indy, Tadpole SPARC/PowerPC/Alpha portables) and alternate futures where workstation vendors or NeXT-like systems dominate.