Sleep regularity is a stronger predictor of mortality than sleep duration (2023)
Genetic and individual variability in sleep need
- Several participants report naturally short sleep (e.g., 4–6 hours) with good daytime functioning, sometimes linked to known mutations like DEC2.
- Others need 8–10+ hours and feel awful below that; some can easily sleep 12 hours on days off.
- Many stress that population-level recommendations don’t always apply to individuals.
Anxiety, sleep, and mindset
- Some readers feel the study adds to health anxiety and makes sleep harder.
- Others argue stressing about sleep is counterproductive; focusing on living well, social connection, activity, and not catastrophizing helped their sleep more than chasing studies or gadgets.
Correlation, causation, and confounders
- Multiple comments highlight that sleep regularity may be a marker, not a cause, of poor health.
- Proposed confounders: stress, low income, shift work, caregiving for children or grandchildren, chronic disease, substance use, mental health, and neuroticism/ACEs.
- There’s debate over whether adjustments for sociodemographic and lifestyle factors are sufficient; some see such skepticism as essential scientific critique.
Study design limitations
- Main concern: only ~1 week of accelerometer data used to predict mortality 10–15 years later.
- People question whether that week captures chronic sleep patterns vs late-life illness.
- The paper itself notes this snapshot as a limitation and calls for longer tracking.
Irregular schedules, circadian rhythm, and real-life constraints
- Many describe non-24/“drifting” cycles (25–28h), night-owl tendencies, or extreme patterns (e.g., 32h awake / 12h asleep).
- Parenting, shift work, on-call duty, and DST are cited as major disruptors; some say regularity is practically impossible.
- A few suggest sleep irregularity may just reflect life difficulties and structural pressures.
Practical strategies people report
- Fixed wake time (or wake window), even on weekends, is often cited as key; others say this failed them.
- Tactics mentioned: reducing evening light/screens, exercise, avoiding alcohol, naps, power naps during extreme events, sleep apps, wearables, vibrating alarms, smart bulbs, and even pets as “natural alarm clocks.”
- Some favor “sleep when tired” and reject rigid schedules if they chronically fail.
Magnitude of effect and tradeoffs
- One reader reads the survival curves as only a small absolute difference over ~8 years.
- Others argue even a few percent change in mortality from a single modifiable factor is meaningful, among many contributors to longevity.