Why is it so hard to find a job now? Enter Ghost Jobs
What “ghost jobs” are and how common they are
- Many posters report seeing large numbers of openings that never lead to interviews or hires, sometimes reposted for months unchanged; some guess rates as high as 20–50% in tech.
- Others stress this phenomenon is not new (dot‑com bust era, long‑standing public‑sector “pre‑filled” roles).
- Several are skeptical of the paper’s 21% estimate, arguing the methodology (Glassdoor + GPT‑4o + BERT) is weak and lacks validation or historical baseline.
Motivations for ghost or low‑intent postings
- Immigration / visas (H‑1B, H‑2B, green cards, OPT):
- Job ads run purely to satisfy legal “labor market test” requirements, with no intent to displace the existing visa worker.
- For green cards (PERM), managers describe being required to post the current employee’s role, interview citizens, then often neither hire them nor proceed with the green card if a comparable citizen is found.
- This practice is widely criticized as unethical or fraudulent; some argue it shows the H‑1B/green‑card system is structurally broken.
- Signaling and optics:
- Startups and big firms post “we’re hiring” to look healthy and growing to investors, customers, and employees, even under freezes or layoffs.
- Pipeline / HR incentives:
- “Always hiring” postings to “build a pipeline,” keep recruiters busy, practice interviewing, and be ready if headcount appears.
- Some claim it’s mostly theater: recruiters rarely revisit old candidates.
- Internal politics & compliance:
- Roles advertised only to justify predetermined promotions, nepotistic hires, or internal transfers.
- Middle management may post roles whose budget or scope then disappears mid‑process.
Impacts on job seekers
- Widespread reports of:
- Hundreds of applications with few or no responses; especially acute for senior, management, or older candidates.
- Full interview loops ending with “we’re pausing or canceling the role” rather than a clear yes/no.
- Deep frustration, burnout, and some leaving tech or traditional employment entirely.
- Remote work and post‑2021 layoffs increase competition; candidates now compete with global talent, including ex‑FAANG and visa workers.
Hiring‑side perspectives
- Hiring managers report:
- Being flooded with low‑fit or AI‑generated resumes and even fake candidates, making triage noisy and error‑prone.
- Heavy reliance on ATS keyword filters; many good candidates are filtered out, and warm referrals or internal champions dominate.
- Strong bias toward specific tech stacks and “ready‑made” skills; little appetite for training.
Immigration, wages, and legality (highly contested)
- Some argue H‑1B/OPT workers are systematically underpaid, tied to employers, and used to suppress wages; others respond that law requires “prevailing wage” and that data don’t show broad suppression.
- Debate over whether ghost/visa‑driven postings and preference for visa holders violate anti‑discrimination law; some link to recent enforcement actions but acknowledge proof is hard.
- Various reform ideas surface: auctioning H‑1Bs to highest salaries, higher wage floors, automatic green cards for long‑term workers, or stricter, centralized labor‑shortage tests.
Alternative explanations and skepticism
- Several contend that the main reason jobs feel scarce is macro conditions: higher rates, broad hiring freezes, and elevated bars, not just ghost jobs.
- Others warn against confirmation bias: many “ghost” experiences may be disorganized recruiting, internal headcount changes, or simple rejection, which candidates can’t see from outside.
Proposed mitigations and tools
- Suggestions include:
- Requiring public reporting of openings vs hires, or linking to a position’s posting history.
- Treating willful fake postings as fraud or labor theft with meaningful penalties.
- Community ratings for companies in job boards (including HN “Who’s Hiring”).
- New candidate‑centric tools that track which postings actually advance applicants and deprioritize repeated reposts.