Mouseless – fast mouse control with the keyboard

Overall reception and use cases

  • Many commenters find the idea compelling and immediately try it; some say it quickly feels natural and can be faster and less distracting than reaching for a mouse, especially on large or multi‑monitor setups.
  • Others see it mainly as helpful for RSI, accessibility, or keyboard‑centric workflows, but are skeptical it can beat a mouse for fine‑grained movement in everyday use.
  • Some see strong potential for accessibility, multimodal LLM control, and as an alternative to hardware pointing devices.

How Mouseless works (as inferred)

  • Screen is divided into a 26×26 grid, each cell labeled with a unique two‑letter combination.
  • User holds a modifier, types the two letters of the cell under the target, and the cursor jumps to that cell’s center.
  • A second, smaller lettered subgrid can appear within a chosen cell for higher precision.
  • Users can optionally press a key (e.g., space) while still holding the modifier to click immediately.

Comparisons and alternatives

  • Strong parallels to:
    • MacOS Voice Control grid.
    • Vimium‑style link hints and apps like Vimac, Shortcat, Homerow, Wooshy, Scoot, warpd, Scoot, Superkey.
    • Grid/BSP tools like keynav, griddle, and warpd’s grid mode.
  • Windows and Linux users list similar tools (mousemaster, keynavish, AhkCoordGrid, TPMouse, wl‑kbptr, warpd), but several note nothing identical on Windows yet.

UX, onboarding, and video feedback

  • Multiple people find the demo video confusing:
    • Hard to see the grid, the cursor, and the notion that each box has two letters.
    • Requests for larger/fullscreen video, clearer cursor, static images, and simpler terminology (“box” instead of “cell”).
  • Suggestions:
    • Visually distinguish first vs second letter in a cell (color, weight) to avoid confusion like “LO vs OL”.
    • Let the overlay follow physical keyboard layout (starting with Q, not A).

Platform and system considerations

  • Multi‑monitor bug on MacOS is noted but said to be slated for fixing.
  • Some point out MacOS has limited but existing keyboard navigation features; others call overall keyboard support poor compared to third‑party tools.
  • One commenter raises concern about documentation around SSL/network proxy handling combined with system‑control permissions, asking for clearer justification.