Why blog if nobody reads it?

Blogging for self: memory, thinking, enjoyment

  • Many posters say they blog primarily for themselves: as a time capsule, public diary, or “web log” of what they were doing and thinking.
  • Technical blogs often function as personal documentation. People frequently Google something and land on their own post, or use posts as long-form gists.
  • Writing is described as “thinking”: it forces clarification, reveals gaps in understanding, and improves communication skills. Some only truly understand topics once they’ve written a post about them.
  • Several mention the intrinsic pleasure and therapeutic value of writing, independent of readership.

Audience, discovery, and traffic

  • Some dispute “if you write it, they won’t come”, noting that over years certain posts unexpectedly gain significant search traffic or go viral (including via HN).
  • Others emphasize that most content gets little attention; blogging is like other creator markets where the top fraction captures most views.
  • Social referrals are said to have collapsed; for some, almost all traffic now comes from HN or search. Algorithms on platforms like Substack can still bootstrap niche newsletters.
  • A recurring theme: it’s better to value a small, high-quality audience than chase large numbers.

Credibility, careers, and self-marketing

  • Blogging is framed as a low-cost way to demonstrate expertise and seriousness; posts can be sent to interviewers, clients, or colleagues and have helped some land jobs or consulting work.
  • Older pre-LLM posts and public Git histories are seen as harder to fake than AI-generated portfolios. There’s discussion of timestamping and archive.org as partial guards against backdating.
  • Others warn that writing “to build a brand” can shift focus from teaching the reader to marketing the author, reducing educational quality.

Public vs private writing

  • Debate: if blogs are mostly for the author, why publish instead of keeping local notes?
  • Arguments for publishing even with few readers: easier cross-device access; linkability; the mere possibility of an audience improves rigor and honesty; occasionally someone is helped or a good conversation starts.
  • Some say they would stop if no one ever read; others explicitly write “as if no one will” and treat readers as a bonus.

AI and blogs

  • Multiple people notice LLMs (ChatGPT, Perplexity, etc.) citing their blogs.
  • Some welcome this as amplifying knowledge; others dislike that their work helps enrich large AI companies and may be misattributed or distilled into low-quality summaries.

Indie web, tooling, and discovery

  • HN commenters strongly favor simple, JS-light blogs with proper semantics and RSS; one thread helps a blogger fix button-links and add a feed.
  • There’s concern that search makes personal sites hard to find; suggestions include niche search engines, webrings, and custom directories.
  • Several avoid detailed analytics to reduce anxiety and keep focus on writing itself.