Inheriting is becoming nearly as important as working
Role of Inheritance vs Work
- Many commenters agree the marginal importance of inheritance is rising, largely via housing: parents’ home equity and “down‑payment help” are often decisive for younger buyers, especially in expensive cities.
- Some argue the article overstates things by comparing a stock (inheritances) to a flow (GDP), but others note that even modest inheritances are life‑changing for recipients and structurally exclude those who inherit nothing.
- There’s concern about a “new feudalism” or “landed gentry” where access to property and comfortable lives increasingly depends on family wealth rather than individual effort.
Upward Mobility and Generational Experiences
- Experiences diverge sharply: some UK and US posters say they and their peers are better off than their parents through education and decent jobs; others say they did everything “right” and still can’t afford the homes or security their parents had.
- Several point out that anecdotes from tech or high‑paying fields are outliers; many professions (teaching, nursing, trades in some regions) see stagnant or eroded purchasing power relative to housing, healthcare, and education.
- There’s debate over data: some link to rising real incomes and GDP per capita; others counter with wage–productivity divergence, housing costs, and the shrinking middle class.
Housing, Land, and Georgism
- Housing is repeatedly identified as the core mechanism of wealth transfer from renters to owners.
- Strong support appears for land value tax / Georgism: tax land’s unimproved value heavily to deter speculation, encourage building, and capture unearned gains. Advocates argue land can’t flee and LVT is economically efficient.
- Skeptics question valuation, impact on small owners, and note politics (NIMBYism, property‑owning older voters) is the real bottleneck to building.
Inequality, Wealth Concentration, and Tax Policy
- Many see returns to capital outpacing growth and wages, echoing Piketty and Gary Stevenson: inequality rises even as aggregate income grows, with gains concentrated at the top.
- Proposed fixes include high inheritance or wealth taxes, closing step‑up and loan‑against‑stock loopholes, stronger IRS enforcement, and shifting tax from labor to capital, land, consumption, and pollution.
- Others argue Piketty overstates dynastic wealth and that most billionaires are “self‑made,” though critics reply that starting from millions and compounding still entrenches class power.
Tech vs Rest of Economy
- Multiple posters stress that software careers are an anomaly: high pay, low physical risk, and relatively easy entry compared to medicine, trades, or service work.
- Concern that tech workers generalize their experience and underestimate how hard life is for most workers, including in healthcare, food service, logistics, and education.
Political Economy and Social Stability
- Several comments link concentrated wealth to media and political capture: campaign finance, lobbying, deregulation, and culture‑war distractions used to defend inequality.
- Views diverge on outcomes: some foresee civil conflict or collapse; others think high inequality can persist for long periods with only sporadic unrest.
- War is discussed as historically equalizing (destroying capital), though most emphasize its enormous human cost and reject it as a “solution.”