Forget Twitter threads and write a blog post instead (2021)
Platform changes and UX
- Multiple commenters say the argument for blogs is stronger now that Twitter/X is login-gated and unstable: threads often can’t be viewed without an account, previews don’t render on other platforms, and rate limits or paywalls appear even for logged-in non‑paying users.
- This is seen as terrible UX and a driver for organizations and individuals to move to alternatives (Mastodon, Bluesky) or blogs, especially when they want to embed their own content on their sites.
- Some workarounds exist (Nitter, thread unrollers), but are viewed as clunky and user-hostile.
Why writers still choose threads
- Many participants emphasize that people post threads because that’s where their community already is and where discovery is easiest.
- Threads “atomize engagement”: each tweet has a chance to go viral, which helps audience growth more than a single link to a blog.
- Social platforms down-rank external links, so on-platform threads outperform blog links for reach.
Case for personal blogs
- Strong support for blogs as superior for reading (single coherent page, no login walls, better preservation) and for long-form, thoughtful writing.
- Ownership and archival matter: platforms can lock down, change formats, or vanish; a personal site plus self-archiving is seen as much safer.
- Some writers emphasize intrinsic rewards: writing for oneself, documenting learning, and the satisfaction of a finished post, regardless of traffic.
- Suggested low-friction options include static site generators, GitHub Pages, Substack, Ghost, and similar hosted tools.
Engagement, audience, and motivation
- Several commenters admit they give up blogging because posts get almost no traffic, whereas social networks provide immediate visibility.
- Others argue casual writers overvalue “engagement” if they’re not earning money, but counterpoints note indirect benefits: reputation, networking, and contributing to public discourse.
Decentralized web & RSS nostalgia
- Long side discussion recalls the pre‑social era: RSS/Atom, blogs, IRC, Usenet, webrings.
- Some argue these were “almost good enough” and could have evolved into today’s platform layer; others say they were never usable enough for non‑technical users and lacked discovery and recommendation.
Cognitive and discourse effects of threads
- Critique that threads encourage fragmented, “snippet-based” thinking and degrade writing quality, versus blogs encouraging structured argument.
- Others use threads as rough drafts or idea tests, then promote polished blog posts—suggesting a hybrid approach.
- With current LLMs, some propose using AI to turn threads into proper blog posts, combining reach with better archival and readability.