Amazon to kill off local Alexa processing, all voice requests shipped to cloud
Privacy, Surveillance, and User Reactions
- Many see the change as confirming Alexa is a “wiretap” and say they’ll unplug or trash their devices.
- Others argue this is largely symbolic outrage, since almost all Alexa voice has always gone to the cloud anyway.
- Several commenters downloaded their complete Alexa history and found it disturbing how much intimate behavioral data was captured, prompting them to remove the device.
- Concerns extend to subpoenas and law enforcement access, and hypothetical “duty to report” scenarios (gunshots, self‑harm, abuse phrases).
What Actually Changed (and Confusion About It)
- Multiple participants stress that only a subset of newer devices ever supported limited on‑device processing, and even then most functionality still used the cloud.
- The new move mainly removes a relatively obscure “local only” / “do not send recordings” option used by a small minority.
- Some criticize the headline and coverage as misleading or “ginned‑up outrage,” but others welcome the attention on privacy regardless.
Cloud vs Local Processing and LLMs
- One camp: everything should be done locally now; hardware and models are cheap and small enough.
- Counterpoint: Echo hardware is intentionally underpowered; advanced models and rich context (history, devices, etc.) realistically require cloud resources.
- Advocates of hybrid designs suggest hard‑coded local rules for common commands (“set alarm”, “timer”) and cloud only for complex queries.
- Others argue LLM‑driven assistants blur the line between “simple” and “complex” queries, making full-cloud processing more attractive for vendors.
Alternatives, FOSS, and Repurposing
- Interest in open/homegrown assistants: Home Assistant voice, OpenVoiceOS (successor to Mycroft), and local Whisper setups.
- Reports that Home Assistant’s current voice stack and microphones lag behind Alexa in quality and latency.
- Several point to hacking/repurposing Echo hardware to avoid e‑waste, e.g., turning old Dots into general Linux devices and sending audio to local transcription.
Other Platforms and OS Trends
- Comparisons with Siri and Google: Siri supports some offline commands; Google often does parallel local+cloud processing.
- Apple gets relatively better privacy marks, but some users report being forced to accept cloud dictation notices, leading to distrust.
- Broader frustration appears with major OSes “neutering” local capabilities in favor of cloud integration, pushing some users back toward Linux.