Sam Altman and Jony Ive Will Force A.I. Into Your Life
Form Factor, Hardware, and “Smartphone Is Enough”
- Many doubt any new AI gadget can beat a phone: once you add a keyboard and screen, you’ve essentially reinvented a smartphone.
- Voice-only or screenless devices are seen as niche: voice is awkward in public, privacy is worse, and most people already underuse voice-to-text.
- Speculation ranges from pins, rings, collars, lanyard mics, and “cybernetic clothes” to AR glasses, but most think these would be novelties that end up in a drawer like VR headsets.
- Humane AI Pin and similar products are repeatedly cited as cautionary flops; expectation is this will be “Google Glass but more expensive and less popular.”
Wearables vs. Smart Glasses
- Some think the only truly compelling form is lightweight AR glasses with wide FOV, cameras, and audio, tethered to whatever device you want.
- Others note that existing smart-glasses efforts (and Ive’s reported skepticism of wearables) suggest this team may instead target a desk device or non-glasses form.
- Closed ecosystems vs. generic, connect-to-anything AR hardware is a recurring tension.
Emotional Attachment and Tethered AI Companions
- The thread recalls a defunct children’s AI companion that abruptly went offline, leaving kids with a “dead” friend, as a warning about forming bonds with subscription-based AIs.
- Similar concerns are raised about adult AI companions whose personalities can be silently rewritten by vendors.
- This is framed as conditioning people to accept abandonment and remote-control over intimate relationships.
- Open-source LLMs (e.g., locally runnable models) are seen as a partial antidote: less vendor lock-in and more control, even if not state-of-the-art.
Altman + Ive: Vision vs. Hype
- Several argue Ive is a great stylist but an uneven product designer who worked best under a strong product leader; Altman is not seen as that.
- The partnership is widely viewed as a valuation and PR play: lend design prestige, raise money, and if the hardware flops, the company still wins financially.
- Comparisons are made to earlier ventures that went nowhere; some expect a repeat “raise a lot, ship little” pattern.
Broader Tech & AI Fatigue
- Strong sentiment that much recent consumer/AI tech feels like “innovation for its own sake,” adding complexity, energy use, and surveillance while delivering marginal benefit.
- Others push back with concrete improvements (modern laptops, phones, ANC, EVs, speech-to-text, games), arguing life has improved.
- Multiple commenters feel trapped: you can’t simply “use 10-year-old tech” because old channels (non-app banking, paper menus, 2G phones) are removed.
- Fears that AI will be marketed through anxiety (“adopt or fall behind”), and that governments and corporations will welcome a world where everyone filters thinking through AI.