U.S. sanctions cloud provider 'Funnull' as top source of 'pig butchering' scams
Emotional impact & victim profiles
- Multiple commenters share devastating family stories: parents losing $250k–$300k+ and homes, despite repeated warnings from relatives.
- Victims are often older, lonely, recently divorced or widowed; some were previously savvy, but cognitive decline and isolation increased vulnerability.
- Several note lasting anger not just at scammers but also at the victim, and guilt over not intervening more forcefully (e.g., conservatorship).
How pig-butchering scams work
- Scammers cultivate long-term emotional bonds (“fattening the pig”) via romance, companionship, or empathy, then pivot to “investment” or “urgent help” requests.
- Hooks vary: high crypto returns, rescuing the scammer from bureaucracy, or helping with made-up financial distress.
- Commenters debate whether “greed” is central; many argue trust, naivete, loneliness, ego, sunk-cost/denial, and “savior” impulses are often more important.
Crypto’s role and broader debate
- Strong view: crypto (especially stablecoins) dramatically lowers friction for cross-border, irreversible transfers, making pig-butchering and ransomware much easier and more profitable.
- Others say such scams existed with wires/cash; crypto is a new rail but not the root cause.
- Counterpoint: crypto is a lifeline under capital controls, corrupt or unstable regimes, or for sanctioned/out-of-system individuals (e.g., migrants, political refugees); use cases include remittances, savings, payouts, and niche payments.
- Extended arguments over irreversibility: bank transfers are technically reversible and legally contestable; crypto is designed to resist reversal, which heavily favors criminals but can also shield against state overreach.
Coerced scam labor and “modern slavery”
- Some describe pig-butchering compounds in Southeast Asia as outright forced labor and trafficking; others claim many workers are simply well-paid call-center scammers.
- Cited books, news, and specific rescues from compounds are invoked as evidence for large-scale coercion.
Funnull, sanctions, and due process
- Funnull is identified as a malicious CDN/anti-DDoS actor linked to previous Polyfill.io supply-chain attacks.
- Debate over U.S. sanctions: some see them as obvious, necessary action against foreign criminal infrastructure; others worry about executive power without judicial oversight and limited due process for foreign entities.
Mitigations: telecoms, platforms, and ISPs
- Calls for:
- Stronger responsibility for cloud providers, CDNs, captchas, and hosting to act on abuse reports.
- Authenticating caller identity and fixing easily spoofed phone systems.
- Bank and legal tools (conservatorships, property monitoring, transaction friction/alerts for elders).
- Optional ISP-level or home-firewall blocking of known-bad ASNs and recently registered domains.
Terminology and societal trust
- Interpol’s push to drop “pig butchering” for “romance baiting” splits opinion; some say less-stigmatizing terms may increase reporting, others find the original metaphor more accurate and not always romance-related.
- Broader discussion over high-trust Western societies colliding with low-trust global environments; some want more skepticism, others stress that high trust is a core asset worth preserving.