Researchers develop ‘transparent paper’ as alternative to plastics

Material & Process

  • Described as a transparent, cellulose-based sheet with strength “similar to polycarbonate,” biodegradable in seawater within months via microbes.
  • Commenters debate what “similar strength” means; some argue tensile strength alone is a vague metric and not sufficient to claim plastic-like performance.
  • Chemistry discussion notes the key solvent (lithium bromide in water) is a relatively benign salt and recyclable, unlike older viscose processes for cellophane that used highly toxic reagents.

Relation to Existing Cellulose Plastics

  • Multiple comparisons to cellophane, celluloid, cellulose acetate, glassine, and “transparent wood.”
  • Key distinction: this research aims for thick, fully cellulose-based transparent sheets, whereas:
    • Cellophane is thin and hard to make thick.
    • Paper is thick but opaque.
    • Many historical cellulose plastics use additional reactive chemicals and aren’t “pure cellulose.”
  • Some see this as an incremental advance rather than a wholly new concept; commercial viability is seen as the real question.

Use Cases: Bags, Cups, Straws, Packaging

  • Some enthusiasm for replacing single-use items (bags, cups, food containers, windows in cardboard packaging).
  • Straws spark debate: performance concerns (sogginess, taste) vs environmental symbolism (turtle video); some argue the turtle issue was overblown but drove paper-straw adoption.
  • One commenter cites the paper’s main target as food packaging, especially where transparency boosts sales compared to opaque paper packs.

Environmental Impact & Waste

  • Strong thread on plastics’ core problem: persistence and microplastic pollution vs simple volume in landfills.
  • Disagreement over best end-of-life option:
    • One side: landfilling plastic is a form of carbon sequestration; burning worsens climate change.
    • Other side: burning in high-grade facilities (sometimes for energy) is preferable to microplastic spread.
  • Some argue ocean dumping and “waste colonialism” are the main issues; others push back on claims that “almost all recycling” ends up in the ocean.

Economics, Policy, and Behavior

  • Many stress that cost and manufacturability will determine adoption; article mentions roughly 3× cost of conventional paper.
  • Suggestions: plastic bans, taxes, and incentives; bottle-deposit schemes cited as effective at changing behavior.
  • Skepticism that any single “plastic replacement” can match plastics’ combination of cheapness, moldability, durability, and safety; transparent paper is seen as one niche solution among many needed.