The Danish Ministry of Digitalization Is Switching to Linux and LibreOffice
Motivations and Digital Sovereignty
- Many see the move as primarily political, not financial: reducing dependence on a US vendor that could be leveraged geopolitically (Trump/Greenland, CLOUD Act, ICC email blocking).
- Commenters frame it as part of a broader European “digital sovereignty” push and welcome any reduction in single‑vendor lock‑in.
- Some argue this is especially important for Denmark if it ever wants credible leverage or ability to sanction the US in response to future conflicts.
Past Government Migrations and Flip‑Flops
- Multiple examples are cited where governments moved to Linux/OpenOffice and later reverted to Microsoft (Munich, Lower Saxony, Vienna).
- One counterexample (French Gendarmerie) is mentioned as a quiet success.
- Several people suspect such announcements often serve as leverage to negotiate better Microsoft licensing deals.
Operational and User Challenges
- Biggest practical hurdles identified:
- Deep dependence on Excel (complex models, “apps in spreadsheets”) and PowerPoint.
- Outlook/Exchange integration and Active Directory‑centric infrastructure.
- Mixed Windows/Linux fleets during transition and upskilling IT staff.
- Some report Linux fleets being easier to manage; others claim Windows still has superior central management tooling.
- User resistance is expected: many office workers are described as “cargo cult” users who break down when workflows or UIs change.
LibreOffice Quality, UX, and Alternatives
- Strong disagreement on LibreOffice:
- Critics: ugly UI, poor performance, instability, weak compatibility (especially for advanced Excel features, charts, Impress vs PowerPoint).
- Supporters: Writer superior to Word for serious text, good typography and OpenDocument support, calc adequate for most needs, CSV handling better than Excel.
- Calls for governments to fund UX modernization, online collaborative editing, and bugfixes; mentions of OnlyOffice and the French/German “Suite Numérique” as alternatives.
Cloud, Lock‑In, and Scale of Change
- Cloud/SaaS is seen as increasing vendor lock‑in and forced upgrade cycles, strengthening the case for open source.
- Several note Denmark’s heavy Microsoft dependence (O365, Azure, C#) and see this as a small but important pilot; others point out only ~79 employees are affected and view it as symbolic or political posturing.