Waymo rides cost more than Uber or Lyft and people are paying anyway
Why Riders Pay a Premium for Waymo
- Many commenters say they deliberately choose Waymo even when it’s more expensive.
- Key motivations:
- No need to tip or stress over ratings.
- Private space: no driver, no small talk, no smells, no pressure.
- Novelty and “riding the future” appeal, especially for visitors.
Perceived Safety, Comfort, and Consistency
- Numerous reports of bad Uber/Lyft experiences: reckless or sleepy driving, drivers high/drunk, strong odors, loud calls or media, unsafe late‑night situations.
- Waymo is seen as:
- More predictable in driving style (smooth, non‑aggressive, better around cyclists/pedestrians).
- More trustworthy than “a random human” for many, especially women, parents, and those prone to motion sickness.
- Some still feel “autonomavertigo” and distrust giving up control, but they are a minority in this thread.
Human Interaction, Tipping, and Cultural Shifts
- Strong theme: people will pay extra to avoid awkward or stressful social interactions (drivers, phone calls, upselling, tipping prompts).
- Tipping is a major psychological factor: some overtip heavily, others refuse; several say they’d rather pay a higher all‑in price than deal with tipping at all.
- Commenters note generational and cultural differences (US vs Europe/Japan) in tolerance for phone calls and face‑to‑face service.
Pricing, Value, and Profitability
- Some data in the article and anecdotes show Waymo ~30–50% more per km; others report Waymo often cheaper (especially vs Uber Black or “comfort” tiers).
- Once tips and upgrades are included, several argue the effective gap is smaller or even reversed.
- Unclear whether Waymo is profitable; many assume current prices are shaped by high capex, limited fleet, and market-testing rather than true marginal cost.
Cleanliness, Maintenance, and Future Drift
- Today’s Waymos are consistently described as clean, well‑maintained Jaguars or Ioniqs.
- Skeptics predict “enshittification”: dirtier interiors, more aggressive optimization, more nickel‑and‑diming as competition settles.
- Others argue centralized depots, cameras, and easy reporting give Waymo better long‑term tools to keep cars clean than individual gig drivers.
Labor, Society, and Alternatives
- Tension between loving the product and worrying about displacing low‑skill drivers and worsening already poor human‑centric services (call centers, bureaucracy).
- Debate over whether AVs should complement or replace public transit; some see them as superior taxis, others as a distraction from building good transit.
Coverage, Reliability, and Edge Cases
- Big practical downside: limited service areas and fleet size; in many cities Uber/Lyft or taxis are still the only option.
- Some concern about remote operators behind the scenes and about constant in‑cabin surveillance and data retention.