I built an ADHD app with interactive coping tools, noise mixer and self-test
Overall Reception & Intended Use
- Many respondents appreciate the idea: focused tools for coping, ambient sound, and quick screening feel relevant to ADHD struggles (anxiety, procrastination, overwhelm).
- Some users explicitly say tools like this could help them or their kids avoid years of trial-and-error coping.
- Others report using the site immediately… as a way to procrastinate, highlighting the paradox of ADHD tools.
UI/UX and Feature Feedback
- Landing page wording (“I am Anxiety/Procrastination/Overwhelm”) is grammatically off; suggestions to use adjectives and rephrase.
- Coping-tool interface is seen as cluttered and visually overwhelming—too many buttons, changing layouts, jumping controls, and scrollbar height changes are especially problematic for ADHD users.
- Suggestions: group techniques into collapsible sections, keep controls in fixed positions, add animations to explain layout changes, improve placement of the “Atmosphere” control.
- Requests for dark mode and a version that doesn’t dim the screen; some mention browser-level dark modes as a workaround.
AI-Generated Images and Content Trust
- Strong negative reactions to AI thumbnails and suspected AI-written blog posts; several say AI imagery signals “low-effort” or “monetization-focused” and undermines trust in mental-health advice.
- Concerns that if artwork is AI, users may doubt whether techniques or articles are genuinely human-created or expert-reviewed.
- A minority defend AI art as a practical tradeoff, preferring resources go to core functionality; others suggest replacing it with stock, public-domain, or simple human-made images.
Monetization and Ethics
- Mixed views on the $5/month freemium subscription:
- Some see it as reasonable and support monetizing helpful tools.
- Others prefer a one-time purchase, noting subscriptions add cognitive load for ADHD users.
- A few frame low-cost but massively scalable apps as potential “cash grabs,” especially when targeting vulnerable users.
Self-Test and Self-Diagnosis Concerns
- Several commenters criticize the ADHD self-test as simplistic and methodologically weak (no control/inverted questions, cultural bias, school-age assumptions).
- A psychiatrist and others warn that ADHD and autism have become “trendy,” with many low-quality self-diagnosis tools; they stress that proper diagnosis requires clinical interviews, validated instruments, and context.
- Some recount being misdiagnosed or dismissed by professionals; others say all online self-tests they tried would have led them to the wrong conclusion.
- There’s tension between fears of over-diagnosis/medicalization and fears of under-diagnosis and lifelong, untreated suffering.
Broader ADHD, Treatment, and Society Debate
- Long subthreads debate:
- Reliability of diagnostic tools vs. real-world lived experience.
- Stimulant medications vs. non-stimulant or psychotherapeutic approaches, and how treatment efficacy is (poorly) monitored.
- Overlapping symptoms with trauma, anxiety, and personality traits, and the risk of missing root causes (e.g., complex PTSD).
- Frustration with gatekeeping, inconsistent clinicians, and the difficulty of obtaining meds even with clear impairment.
- Annoyance with “ADHD as a superpower” narratives; several describe ADHD as predominantly harmful rather than empowering.
- Concerns about pharma-driven expansion of adult ADHD markets versus genuine unmet needs.
Miscellaneous
- Users suggest improving visuals (e.g., animating existing cartoon figures, removing AI thumbnails).
- Some skepticism that the solo developer may abandon the project; others note the author’s stated ADHD and personal motivation to continue.