I deleted my second brain

Emotional value of old notes and artifacts

• Several commenters say they’d be saddened to delete a big archive. Old notes feel like photos of past thoughts, triggering memories of earlier selves, interests, and life phases.
• Others regret past purges of journals, trinkets, or childhood work, feeling they destroyed “eras” of themselves.
• A different group is actively trying to detach from the past, choosing to throw away boxes of old stuff without even re‑opening them to avoid another 20 years of storage and ambivalence.

Notes as tool vs burden

• Many distinguish between notes as:
  • Practical external memory (how‑tos, commands, account details, logs of rare tasks, project state), which they’d never delete.
  • Backlogs of goals, to‑dos, and half‑baked ideas that become a source of guilt and anxiety.
• Several readers interpret the deleted “second brain” as mainly the latter: a mausoleum of deferred self‑improvement, especially intertwined with sobriety and anxiety.

Skepticism about PKM / “second brain” culture

• Widespread critique of elaborate PKM systems (Zettelkasten, PARA, Roam/Obsidian graphs, atomic notes):
  • They can turn note‑taking into a full‑time hobby and a sophisticated form of procrastination.
  • Linking and perfect structure are seen as traps that shift focus from thinking and doing to managing the system.
• Some argue real insight comes from subtraction, reflection, and writing in one’s own words, not hoarding quotes. Others say the original Zettelkasten success story is over‑sold.

Preferred alternatives and “middle ways”

• Many advocate simpler setups:
  • One or few plain‑text/org/Notes files, minimal tags, heavy reliance on search.
  • Daily journals and project logs, occasionally culled or archived by date.
  • Paper notebooks that are inherently selective and hard to over‑organize.
• Common advice: archive or zip old vaults rather than delete; let them sit “out of the way” for possible future nostalgia or reuse.

LLMs, organization, and future regrets

• Some think deleting a large corpus now is shortsighted; it could feed a local LLM later, making organization unnecessary.
• Others counter that the psychological weight of the archive is the real problem, and irreversible deletion can be genuinely liberating—even if it sacrifices potential future value.