Whole-genome ancestry of an Old Kingdom Egyptian
Interpretation of the Study
- Several commenters push back on the idea that the paper “proves” Egyptians came from Mesopotamia, noting:
- It’s based on a single individual with ~20% eastern Fertile Crescent ancestry and ~80% North African ancestry.
- The paper itself frames Mesopotamian links as admixture and “possibility” of settlement, not a wholesale population replacement.
- Genetic similarity between regions does not establish direction of migration.
Egyptian Archaeology and State Control
- Multiple comments claim Egyptian archaeology is heavily politicized:
- The state and antiquities authorities are said to enforce a national narrative of continuous, autochthonous Egyptian identity.
- Researchers who contradict this narrative, or bypass powerful gatekeepers, allegedly risk loss of access or worse.
- A prominent archaeologist is cited as embodying gatekeeping, ego, and tourism-driven conservatism; others argue his behavior aligns with economic incentives (tourism as major GDP contributor).
Nationalism, Identity, and Origin Stories
- Commenters connect Egypt’s sensitivities to global patterns:
- Similar “we’ve always been here” myths appear in India, China, and elsewhere.
- Some argue that archaeology and Egyptology were historically entangled with colonialism and remain politicized everywhere.
- Others note modern Egyptians’ complex and contested identities (Arab, Coptic, Nubian, Bedouin, “Pharaonic”) and uneven sense of ownership of ancient heritage.
Migration, Mixing, and Methodological Limits
- Several emphasize that human groups have always moved and mixed; “pure” populations are a myth.
- Others stress:
- Admixture is expected given Egypt’s long-standing trade, war, and diplomacy with the Levant, Anatolia, and Kush.
- One genome cannot represent an entire society, and burial context (pot, rock-cut tomb) does not cleanly map to poor vs elite status; interpretations here are disputed.
Appearance and Genetic Affinities
- Supplementary material is cited suggesting this individual likely had dark to black skin and phenetic similarity to modern Bedouins / West Asians rather than sub‑Saharan Africans.
- There is debate over how ancient Near Eastern populations looked and how Egyptians represented themselves vs Nubians/Libyans in art, with no consensus in the thread.
Broader Reflections
- Some see the study as a small but valuable data point in a larger effort to trace population movements across North Africa and the Near East.
- Others worry about modern political narratives—both nationalist and anti‑colonial—shaping how such findings are interpreted and weaponized.