I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA
Work authorization & visa pathways
- For remote work outside the U.S., no U.S. work authorization is needed even if the employer is American.
- For coming to the U.S., options discussed:
- O‑1 for “extraordinary ability” (no degree required; criteria-based, not pure “genius”). Cost estimates in the thread range roughly $5–15k, not $100k.
- H‑1B is easier substantively but constrained by the annual lottery; cap‑exempt roles at universities and research orgs (e.g. Fermilab, NASA) bypass the lottery.
- Citizenship-specific visas: E‑3 (Australians), TN (Canadians/Mexicans), and others (Chile, Singapore) seen as relatively easy if you have an offer.
- L‑1 is straightforward via large multinationals after a year abroad; harder but possible for smaller firms.
- E‑2/E‑1 treaty visas let founders and same‑nationality employees run/build businesses in the U.S.
Green cards, EB categories, and timelines
- EB‑2 NIW is now backlogged and, in practice, closer in difficulty to EB‑1A; several commenters/answers recommend EB‑1A as the better high‑achiever route.
- Country of birth, not citizenship, drives EB‑2/EB‑3 queue length; India/China face long waits.
- Approved I‑140s generally lock in a priority date after 180 days, even if the employer withdraws.
- H‑1B holders with approved I‑140s can get extensions beyond the 6‑year limit; NIW approval can enable 3‑year extensions.
- PERM processing is slow but not reportedly more denial‑prone right now; batching recruitment and premium processing can shave some time.
YC and accelerators
- Attending an accelerator is framed as business activity, not “work,” so B‑1 status is usually appropriate; B‑2 (tourist) is not.
- Participation can strengthen an O‑1 case but can’t reliably be treated as a qualifying “award” or “membership.”
Enforcement climate, rights, and travel
- Multiple threads express anxiety about ICE, DHS “revisiting” past green card/citizenship approvals, and denaturalization rhetoric.
- Advice: carry proof of status (green card or passport+I‑94), know your rights (ACLU resources cited), and have an immigration attorney’s contact.
- Law technically requires green card holders to carry the card at all times; many don’t, accepting the small legal risk vs. loss/replacement hassle.
- Some report CBP inspecting devices and social media for green card holders; isolated examples of detention are mentioned.
- For long stays abroad, reentry permits can protect green card status for years; the 6‑month rule mainly affects naturalization “continuous residence,” not mere LPR validity.
O‑1 criteria and perceived abuse
- Clarified that O‑1 has A and B subcategories (science/business vs arts/entertainment); entertainers and media figures can qualify.
- Debate over whether certain podcasters or models should get “extraordinary ability” visas; others counter that the statute explicitly covers such fields and aims to attract high‑impact talent, not only scientists/engineers.
- Founders can sometimes meet the “high salary or other remuneration” test using equity valued by arm’s‑length fundraising.
- Premium processing can significantly reduce O‑1 adjudication delays.
Policy, ethics, and labor-market tensions
- One thread argues H‑1B and other worker programs displace U.S. CS grads; others push back that the comparison mixes entry‑level and senior/specialized roles and that foreign grads face their own structural disadvantages (OPT limits, E‑Verify constraints, high costs).
- Some commenters criticize “visa as a service” startups and VC behavior as skirting or commoditizing immigration rules.
- A long political subthread links current immigration crackdowns and denaturalization talk to broader anti‑democratic or “tech bro” political projects; others emphasize still supporting high‑skill immigration while being concerned about citizens’ rights.
Status complications & edge cases
- Examples discussed: running a startup on H‑1B (nuanced; often requires concurrent H‑1B), transitioning from TPS or J‑1 to F‑1/O‑1, TN for software engineers with CS degrees (some recent CBP friction but still being approved), and green‑card holders living abroad as digital nomads.
- General pattern: many scenarios are fact‑specific, with repeated advice to get individualized legal consultations rather than rely solely on forum guidance.