More honey bees dying, even as antibiotic use halves

Pesticides, neonicotinoids, and regulation

  • Many commenters find it striking that the article barely mentions pesticides, especially neonicotinoids, which they see as a major driver of bee and broader insect decline.
  • Discussion of Canadian rules: Ontario/Québec tightened neonic use; Alberta didn’t, with explanations ranging from politics to different seeding equipment and federal planter-dust regulations. What some call “bans” are described as licensing plus theater, not outright prohibition.
  • EU neonic bans are cited as a big policy move; people note strong evidence of human health harms, but say data on ecological effectiveness of the bans is still unclear.
  • Several argue bee declines are clearly multifactorial (pesticides, habitat loss, parasites, monoculture), and criticize narratives that swap in a single new culprit (like NO₂) as a distraction.

Antibiotics, NO₂, and how to read the study

  • Some think it’s obvious that reducing prophylactic antibiotics without alternatives will worsen outcomes, and that the surprise expressed in the article is misplaced.
  • Others emphasize confounding: antibiotics are more likely given to already-sick hives, so simple correlations can mislead.
  • Beekeepers note bacterial diseases are a relatively small part of the problem compared with mites and viruses.
  • The Nature paper’s finding that NO₂ predicts overwinter mortality, possibly via degrading floral odours, is seen as interesting but not universally convincing; some compare it to past “next 5G” style explanations.

Varroa mites, viruses, and colony collapse

  • Multiple links and comments highlight varroa mites and the viruses they vector as central to recent mass die‑offs, particularly where mites evolved resistance to miticides.
  • Some argue neonicotinoids may increase susceptibility to mites/viruses, suggesting strong interaction effects rather than a single cause.

Honey bees as livestock vs native pollinators

  • Repeated theme: honey bees in North America are non‑native, industrially managed “cattle,” not the bees “we” need to save ecologically.
  • Claims that honeybee hives outcompete native pollinators and simplify plant communities are partly supported but also challenged; evidence is described as habitat- and season-dependent, with urban vs wildlands behaving differently.
  • One view: honeybees are economically essential, but agriculture and public messaging have conflated “pollinators” with “honey bees,” starving attention and funding for natives.

Industrial beekeeping and alternative practices

  • Migratory, high‑density commercial hives are criticized as disease‑spreading, stressful, and analogous to factory farming. Some hobbyists report being disturbed enough to quit honey entirely.
  • Discussion of hive designs (Langstroth vs Rose) that allow more “natural” brood/honey patterns and selection for resilient bees. Skeptics ask why, if such methods are superior, they haven’t outcompeted conventional practices.
  • This leads to a broader argument about capitalism and externalities: short‑term output and cheap pollination win over long‑term bee vitality and ecological impacts.

Supporting wild bees and habitat

  • There’s strong enthusiasm for native solitary bees (mason, carpenter, stingless “melipona” types), which are often docile, efficient pollinators and easy to support.
  • Practical measures discussed: drilling holes or using tubes for mason bees, tolerating carpenter bees in wood, planting clover and diverse, native flowers, reducing lawn intensity, and leaving leaf litter. People report noticeable increases in bees, fireflies, and other insects when they change yard management.
  • Scaling mason or native bees to industrial agriculture is seen as technically promising but not yet solved; current large‑scale pollination still relies on portable honeybee hives.

Broader insect decline and the “windshield phenomenon”

  • Many reference the dramatic drop in insects on windshields compared to decades ago, tying it to general insect and bird declines and intensive agriculture.
  • A minority suggest alternative explanations (more aerodynamic cars, coatings, behavioral evolution of insects away from roads), but others counter that anecdote and formal studies both point to real, large-scale population drops.
  • Local anecdotes show both decline and recovery: in some areas, reduced pesticide use and more diverse vegetation quickly bring back bees, dragonflies, and fireflies.