Dial-up Internet to be discontinued
Modern Web on Dial-Up (and Other Slow Links)
- Consensus: most modern sites are effectively unusable at 56k; page loads would take minutes to tens of minutes.
- Simple, text-first sites (HN, personal blogs, “smolweb”/HTML+CSS only) are considered viable; once you add large images or heavy JS, it breaks down.
- Several people point out that you can simulate dial-up via browser dev tools (Chrome, Firefox, Safari) or by experiencing weak mobile coverage, which can approximate or exceed dial-up pain.
- “Lite” or text-only versions of news sites (e.g., lite.cnn.com, text.npr.org) are praised and sometimes preferred even on fast connections.
- Adblocking (e.g., uBlock Origin) is suggested as a major performance win on slow links.
Who Still Uses Dial-Up and Why
- Some rural or remote users still rely on dial-up because DSL, cable, or good cellular coverage aren’t available or are prohibitively expensive.
- Where available, satellite (HughesNet, later Starlink) or new fiber builds have replaced dial-up, but coverage is patchy.
- Dial-up is mostly seen as usable only for basic email (without images), text-heavy sites, or text-mode browsers like lynx.
Technical Limits and Infrastructure
- Dial-up speed is still effectively capped around 56 kbps due to analog phone line limitations (~3.1 kHz channel / 64k digital channels, with signaling overhead).
- Many users historically never reached 56k; noisy lines often forced 33.6k or less.
- Some areas never got DSL due to distance from central offices or old equipment; new deployments tend to leapfrog straight to fiber.
SPA vs. Server-Rendered vs. Native for Low Bandwidth
- One side argues SPAs can be good for low bandwidth: large bundle once, then minimal incremental traffic.
- Others counter that typical SPAs ship massive JS bundles and fail to load at all on bad connections, while simple server-rendered HTML + forms remains robust and lightweight.
- Some suggest offline-first or native apps as the ideal for very poor or intermittent connectivity.
AOL, Business Model, and Sunset
- Surprise that AOL still existed as an ISP in 2025.
- Dial-up was reportedly a major revenue source as late as 2010; by 2014 it had shrunk to a small share as AOL pivoted to ads/media.
- Concern that customers may keep getting billed for “AOL plans” even after dial-up ends, with plans padded by marginal “benefits.”
- Some users discover and stop paying for legacy AOL subscriptions while keeping free email.
Nostalgia and Cultural Memory
- Strong nostalgia for the dial-up modem sound; links to visual/audio explanations, remixes, and jokes.
- Remembered as a symbol of the idealistic early internet versus today’s more commercial, AI-driven landscape.
- People recall AOL CDs, aggressive marketing, and call-center upsells, plus rival services (Prodigy, MSN).
- Some mark this shutdown as a symbolic end of the dot-com era.