A new experimental Google app for Windows
Product nostalgia and trust in Google
- Many recall Google Desktop (and Google Search Appliance) fondly and see this as a reboot of a 2000s-era idea that once worked very well for local search.
- There is widespread skepticism that the app will be abandoned within a few years, citing Google’s history of killing products and “Labs” branding as a red flag.
- Some argue this track record makes it irrational to adopt new Google products unless absolutely necessary; others push back, saying experimentation and failure are inherent to innovation.
Use cases, competition, and UX
- Users compare the app to existing launchers and search tools: PowerToys Run, Everything, Keypirinha, Flow Launcher, Raycast, KDE’s KRunner, macOS Spotlight, and Electron-based tools.
- Everything and FileLocator Pro/Agent Ransack are repeatedly recommended as fast, reliable, local-only search alternatives.
- Some early testers find the Google app fast and handy (especially for Lens/translation and unified search across local and Google services), but note minor UI annoyances.
Keyboard shortcut and OS integration
- The choice of Alt+Space is contentious: it’s historically the Windows system menu shortcut and is already used by PowerToys Run, ChatGPT, Claude, and others.
- Some see Google’s choice as “classless” or competitive copying; others say Alt+Space / Win+Space are de facto launcher shortcuts and fully reasonable, since users can remap.
Privacy, data collection, and AI training
- A strong theme is distrust of giving Google local file access: fears include indexing contents, associating data with Google accounts, and using it for LLM training.
- Several note the lack of a clear, specific privacy policy for this app; some state that without explicit legal guarantees, they must assume worst‑case behavior.
- This is framed as part of a broader erosion of privacy via cloud sync (OneDrive, Google Drive) and OS-level “recall”/computer-use features.
Unified web + local search concerns
- Many dislike combining web and local search, calling it UX pollution and a “catastrophic privacy risk.”
- Others note that some systems let users disable web results and that companies are likely also motivated by engagement and defensive AI strategies.
Accessibility and scaling
- One subthread asks Google to respect Windows text scaling APIs; another notes Windows accessibility trade-offs and praises per-app or per-display scaling (especially on Linux/KDE).