Dismissed as a joke, UK's first rice crop ripe for picking after hot summer
Rice cultivation methods and the UK fenlands
- Commenters note rice doesn’t require classic flooded paddies; it can be grown in dry or partially flooded systems, as in parts of Australia and the US.
- In this UK experiment, flooded fields are linked to preserving peat in the Fens: keeping peat wet prevents shrinkage and CO₂ release.
- Some argue that “re‑naturalising” fenlands (restoring wetlands) should be a higher priority than new crops.
- Saltwater intrusion is flagged as a potential long‑term risk if sea levels rise around this low‑lying, heavily drained region.
Climate change, geography, and crop viability
- Several posts say it’s unsurprising rice can now be grown outdoors in England, given it’s long grown in northern Italy and southern France and UK summers are becoming more Mediterranean.
- Others push back on the framing “rice is tropical,” pointing to Japan and Korea as non‑tropical rice producers.
- There is disagreement on whether climate change is being reasonably highlighted or opportunistically “jammed into” every BBC science story.
Economics, labour, and subsidies
- Rice is described as low‑margin and only attractive with cheap labour or huge, highly mechanized farms; UK land structure and small fields work against that model.
- Debate splits between:
- Those saying government should not subsidise or should actively discourage economically inefficient boutique rice projects.
- Those arguing local food diversity and security justify subsidies, even for inefficient crops, given geopolitical and climate risks.
- There’s side discussion on how mechanisation and drones are rapidly reducing labour needs in rice farming.
Water, sea level, and land‑use strategy
- The Fens and East Anglia are seen as highly vulnerable to sea‑level rise; long drainage history and pumped systems are noted.
- Some suggest integrating rice into broader coastal and lowland strategies: tidal marsh restoration for storm protection plus inland rice paddies as additional retention buffers.
Media, science reporting, and trust
- Several commenters criticise BBC science coverage as sensationalist, climate‑angle‑driven, and weak on basic botany; others defend the article as reasonable and note such flaws are common across journalism.
- Broader concerns are raised about science being perceived as a policy tool, university PR overhyping results, and journalists not seeking independent expert review, all contributing to public distrust.