Big Tech Told Kids to Code. The Jobs Didn’t Follow [audio]
Access to the podcast / transcript
- Commenters note the original article links to a free podcast; archive links don’t help because they don’t capture audio.
- People want an automatic transcript; some are puzzled why transcripts aren’t available immediately given modern speech-to-text tools.
CS grads, expectations, and hiring bar
- Multiple anecdotes of recent CS grads unable to find tech jobs, some pivoting to sales or non-tech roles.
- Others report long-standing patterns: even in earlier decades, classmates who only “did the classes” often failed to land dev jobs, while those with side projects and open‑source work did better.
- Several say SWE is not a natural outcome of a CS degree; success also requires self‑study, portfolio work, interview prep, and networking.
- Some argue that with the current glut, employers can demand master’s degrees even for entry‑level roles; others call this lazy gatekeeping.
Immigration, offshoring, and labor supply
- One camp sees reducing H‑1B approvals as a way to help laid‑off or new US grads.
- Another camp argues this weakens US tech, reduces competition, and mostly benefits mediocre domestic candidates.
- There’s a side debate on H‑1B1 visas (Chile/Singapore) and fee exemptions.
- Several say offshoring (India, Latin America, Eastern Europe) is a far bigger driver of lost US jobs than AI.
Market dynamics vs collective responses
- Some frame the situation as normal market cycles: demand rises and falls; no degree guarantees stability.
- Others challenge this fatalism, arguing society chooses policies (e.g., student debt, weak safety nets) and could choose differently.
- There’s friction between “adapt or fail” rhetoric and calls for stronger collective safeguards, progressive taxation, or industrial policy.
- Claims that post‑COVID worker “power” was crushed by coordinated corporate behavior are met with counterclaims that any such power was fleeting or media‑driven.
“Learn to code” and responsibility for overselling
- Debate over whether tech was aggressively oversold as a near‑guaranteed high‑pay path by politicians, media, and industry, versus simply being an objectively strong option at the time.
- Some point to retraining rhetoric (“learn to code” for laid‑off workers) and argue it implicitly promised more than it could deliver.
Are developers underpaid or overpaid?
- One view: big tech pushed coding education to flood the labor market, hold down wages, and maximize profits; $300k+ compensation is still underpricing relative to value created.
- Opposing view: tech salaries at that level are already outliers, comparable to or exceeding doctors/lawyers without equivalent barriers or time investment; dev pay is a bubble.
- Further nuance:
- Devs are key but not sole contributors to big‑tech profits; monopoly and network effects matter more than code alone.
- Businesses are expected in a market system to minimize labor costs, just as workers try to maximize pay; neither side is inherently “evil.”
- Others dispute simplistic supply‑and‑demand explanations, pointing to geography, politics, and history as major determinants of pay.
AI vs other causes of the downturn
- Several criticize the AI‑framed headline as clickbait, arguing there’s little concrete evidence that AI coding tools are displacing junior jobs.
- More commonly cited causes: pandemic over‑hiring and subsequent corrections, offshoring, and saturation of common software niches.
Global competition and China
- Some claim US culture undervalues technical talent and overvalues sales and legal roles, contrasting this with China’s allegedly engineer‑led model and rising dominance in critical technologies.
- Others push back, noting accusations of IP theft and questioning China’s originality, while some compare this to historic skepticism about Japan/Taiwan.
Boom–bust and the “cottage industry” phase
- A broader framing compares software to past infrastructure booms:
- Early phases need many engineers; once platforms (e‑commerce, social, game engines, cloud) are built, demand shifts to a smaller maintenance/“musical chairs” market.
- Many domains (e‑commerce, 3D, networks) are now seen as mature, with fewer greenfield opportunities for large cohorts of new developers.