I only use Google Sheets
Role and importance of spreadsheets (and Google Sheets)
- Commenters trace spreadsheets back to Visicalc and call spreadsheets + word processors the original “killer apps” that made PCs indispensable in business.
- Many see spreadsheets as the de facto programming environment for non-programmers: a “vernacular programming” tool that combines data, logic, and UI in a way almost everyone understands.
- Several describe spreadsheets as the best authoring tool available: a quick way to model ideas, run analyses, track inventory, or even run parts of a company.
Strengths: speed, flexibility, collaboration
- Repeated theme: “start with a spreadsheet.” It’s the simplest thing that works, ideal for MVPs, early business processes, and 1‑person or small‑team tools.
- Google Sheets’ sharing and real-time collaboration are seen as significantly easier than traditional Excel workflows; entire teams and even large companies run planning, CRM, ML evaluations, and finances out of Sheets.
- Integration with Apps Script, Colab, APIs, and LLMs lets people turn Sheets into lightweight apps: accounting systems, card-game backends, dashboards, even partial ERPs.
- Personal use is extensive: budgets, expense trackers, asset summaries, project management, training logs, and more.
Weaknesses: scale, correctness, and maintainability
- Critics emphasize lack of structure: fragile formulas, no enforced schema, ad‑hoc relations, poor testing, and opaque business logic that becomes a “black-box” dependency once the creator leaves.
- Version control exists (history, change tracking, CSV+git), but is rarely used systematically. Complex multi-sheet systems can be hard to audit or refactor.
- Many horror stories: enterprises and banks with mission‑critical spreadsheets, inventory or trading systems held together by a few people, and costly multi‑year rewrites into proper apps.
- Some report performance or usability issues on large or poorly designed sheets; others say Sheets handles tens of thousands of rows instantly, suggesting local or design factors.
Cloud dependence, lock‑in, and privacy
- Strong warnings about relying on Google (or any SaaS) as a single point of failure: account bans, product shutdowns, opaque support, and surveillance concerns (third‑party doctrine, FAA702).
- Multiple users “de‑Google” their workflows, self-host alternatives, and stress 3‑2‑1 style backups and Google Takeout. Others note similar risks with Microsoft and other providers.
Alternatives and hybrids
- Numerous tools are mentioned: Excel, LibreOffice, Numbers, OnlyOffice, CryptPad, Airtable, Grist, VisualDB, RowZero, Baserow, Notion databases, Access, Nextcloud-based suites.
- Spreadsheet‑database hybrids are promoted as a middle ground: familiar spreadsheet UX backed by real relational databases and constraints, though adoption and usability vary.