$912 energy independence without red tape
Overall concept & appeal
- Many like the core idea: a renter-friendly, off-grid-ish solar + battery setup acting like a big UPS, avoiding permits and grid export.
- People see it as attractive for backup power, shifting peak usage, or powering specific spaces (sheds, server rooms, garages).
- Some note similar DIY builds and say this is essentially a homebrew “power bank” rather than something fundamentally new.
Wiring, load, and fire safety concerns
- The main criticism is the wiring: long extension cords, a 3 kW inverter feeding a 2.5 kW “power distribution strip,” and many loads on one circuit.
- Multiple comments calculate that at 120 V this implies ~20–22 A continuous, which cheap cords and strips may not safely handle, especially as a quasi-permanent installation.
- People warn about using undersized-gauge extensions, daisy-chaining power strips, and running high-startup loads like fridges and induction cooktops this way.
- Some electricians describe lack of proper overcurrent protection on individual runs, missing RCD/GFCI in paths, and generally non-code “yolo cables through a house.”
Code, legality, insurance, and landlord issues
- Concerns about violating electrical code, voiding fire insurance, and exposing neighbors to risk are widespread.
- Others counter that insurers usually still pay for non-intentional DIY hazards but may drop coverage afterward; however, high-damage, clearly non-compliant setups could be contentious.
- Discussion about renters: some say landlords rarely inspect; others note lease clauses against hazards and potential liability if a fire harms others.
Batteries, inverters, and electrical design debates
- Some criticize the use of low-end LiFePO4 batteries with only two leads and no communications to the inverter, calling it “nasty” for balancing and current control.
- Others argue that built-in BMS plus voltage-based control is common and acceptable, especially at 24 V vs worse 12 V systems.
- Detailed arguments appear around 12 V vs higher-voltage DC, wire gauge, fault currents, and how easy it is to create unfused high-current fire risks.
Safer / more conventional alternatives
- Suggestions include:
- Professionally installed transfer switches or panel interlocks for whole-house backup.
- Off-grid or hybrid inverters placed “in front of” or feeding subpanels, with zero-export settings.
- All-in-one commercial power stations (EcoFlow, Bluetti, Jackery, etc.) with integrated BMS, breakers, and proper outlets.
- Multiple commenters note that spending “a few hundred more” on proper load centers, breakers, and wiring could make a similar system far safer.
Balcony / plug-in solar and grid interaction
- European-style balcony/plug-in solar is raised as a safer, regulated analogy.
- Some mention systems that sense main-panel current and dynamically avoid backfeeding the grid, as a more elegant way to stay net-zero-export.
- There is concern about “suicide cords” and unsanctioned backfeed setups that could endanger line workers if not properly islanded.
Cost, payback, and use cases
- People note the relatively small capacity (around 1.2 kW solar, ~2.4 kWh battery) and question the “energy independence” framing; it’s seen more as partial offset and backup.
- For very high power prices (e.g., $0.55/kWh) it seems financially compelling; at more typical rates (~$0.15/kWh) payback stretches to many years.
- Suggested use cases include backup for outages, small workshops, sheds, or limited household loads rather than whole-house independence.
Meta: reception and site takedown
- Some criticize the thread’s “gatekeeping,” arguing the idea is reasonable but needs better right-sizing and safety notes. Others see the pushback as necessary safety culture.
- The original site went down mid-discussion; several link to archived copies and lament losing a “good bad example” to learn from.