America is now one big bet on AI

Scale of the AI Bet & Bubble Fears

  • Several commenters highlight the article’s claim that AI investment accounts for ~40% of current US GDP growth, calling it an enormous, concentrated macro bet.
  • Many see this as a classic bubble: valuations based on distant or unclear profits, circular/vendor financing, and foreign capital piling into US tech stocks.
  • Comparisons are made to the Roaring Twenties, dot-com, and housing bubbles; some expect a sharp correction once AI’s limits or lack of ROI become clear.

Cost of Living, Public Priorities & Misallocation

  • Some argue AI spending helps drive up costs (via subsidies, power demand, and diverted resources) while groceries, healthcare, and education remain underfunded.
  • Others dispute that AI is a major driver of cost-of-living increases, saying its direct impact on everyday essentials is small or unclear.
  • There’s frustration that private capex chasing AI replaced the promised focus on manufacturing, green energy, and “real economy” infrastructure.

Geopolitics & the “AI Race”

  • One camp views losing the AI race—particularly to China—as an existential economic and strategic threat; AI is framed as the new “means of production.”
  • Skeptics ask “a race to what?” and doubt that marginally better text/video models translate into durable national advantage.

Labor, Productivity & Inequality

  • Many see AI as a top‑0.1% strategy to displace labor and protect profits in a low-growth world.
  • Fears: either AI fails (bubble pops, markets crash) or it works (mass unemployment, collapsing consumer demand).
  • Some foresee a hollowing out of mid/low‑skill cognitive jobs and potential shift toward low-status manual work or “serfdom.”

Real-World Usefulness vs Hype

  • Enthusiasts report dramatic personal productivity gains (coding help, debugging, unblocking side projects) and point to advances in video, robotics, multimodal models, and local MoE models.
  • Skeptics counter that most deployments fail to deliver ROI, much output is “slop,” and year‑to‑year model improvements feel incremental and asymptotic.

Infrastructure, Energy & Stranded Assets

  • Optimists argue that, even if AI fizzles, society keeps the data centers and power build‑out, analogous to railroads or fiber.
  • Critics respond that AI capex is mostly short‑lived chips and specialized facilities, more like tulips than rail—prone to becoming stranded assets within a decade.