US Passport Power Falls to Historic Low
How “Passport Power” Is Measured
- Index is criticized as “silly” for counting every destination equally: China = St. Kitts, Tuvalu = France.
- Many argue for weighted metrics: by population, GDP, tourism desirability, or how many other countries that country lets in visa‑free.
- Others defend equal weighting as more “bias‑free,” though critics respond that this is still a bias and misrepresents practical value.
Alternative Metrics People Propose
- Weight countries that are generally restrictive (US, China, ECOWAS) more than those that admit almost everyone (small island states).
- Add “settlement freedom”: right to live and work elsewhere (e.g., EU, Schengen, Common Travel Area), which would push EU passports to the top.
- Tourism desirability index: Maldives, Iceland, Jamaica, etc., should count more than large but less‑visited countries.
- Several suggest multiple indexes instead of one “best passport.”
Visa-Free vs Visas, eVisas, and ETAs
- The ranking mostly counts visa‑free access; many see little difference between eVisa/ETA and a visa if you must apply, pay, and risk denial.
- Others note ETAs/ESTAs are far easier than full consular visas, which require in‑person visits and more scrutiny.
- Some point out growing use of ETAs/eVisas globally reduces “pure” visa‑free travel for everyone.
Concrete Reasons for US Rank Drop (Per Thread)
- Cited changes: loss of visa‑free access to Brazil; US exclusion from China’s new visa‑free list; adjustments by Papua New Guinea, Myanmar, Somalia, Vietnam; UK’s new ETA.
- Net effect: many other passports gain new visa‑free entries while the US largely stays the same.
Value of US Citizenship Beyond the Index
- Several note the index ignores core benefits of citizenship: home residence rights, work rights abroad (where applicable), and consular protection.
- Some perceive a decline in US “soft power”: more hostility toward Americans, less embassy effectiveness, and less desirability as a marriage/relocation partner.
Dual Citizenship and Second Passports
- Article’s claim that “dual citizenship is the new American dream” is contested as out of touch: ordinary people find extra citizenships hard to obtain.
- Others counter that dual citizenship is increasingly socially accepted (normalized) even if rare, and many Americans have access via ancestry or long residence abroad.
- Debate includes whether academic and legal experts are generalizing from wealthy clients.
Geopolitics, Reciprocity, and US Decline Narratives
- Some tie the ranking drop to broader geopolitical shifts: less fear of US retaliation, more insistence on reciprocity, and tensions with China.
- Others argue the article/metric overstates decline; in practice, where US travelers needed visas before (e.g., China, Vietnam), they still do.
- Thread splits between “US is falling apart / chickens coming home to roost” and pushback that this is hyperbolic and not reflected in markets or day‑to‑day reality.
Experiences at Borders and Practical Mobility
- Multiple anecdotes describe unpleasant US border control, sometimes enough to deter voluntary travel.
- Some emphasize that, legally, US citizens cannot be permanently barred from re‑entry, but note that harassment, delays, and intimidation at the border are still significant risks.
- Paid fast‑track programs (Global Entry, TSA PreCheck) are seen as creating a wealth‑based divide in travel experience.
Index Design Quirks and Miscellaneous Points
- More destinations than passports because territories (e.g., Puerto Rico, Greenland, British islands) are counted separately from their parent states’ passports.
- Another index (cited in thread) explicitly combines travel freedom with settlement freedom and produces different rankings.
- Some question whether the index accounts for the higher likelihood that US citizens who apply for visas are actually approved, even where visa‑free access doesn’t exist.