New Alzheimer's Treatment Clears Plaques from Brains of Mice Within Hours
Perceived Significance of the Mouse Result
- Many see the rapid plaque clearance and cognitive recovery in mice as hopeful but emphasize “mice ≠ humans.”
- Some note the reported six‑month duration might just reflect when the study ended, not necessarily a hard limit.
- Others stress that mouse “Alzheimer’s” is a genetic model that may not fully mirror human disease.
Treatment Burden and Willingness to Trade Off
- Broad agreement that if this worked in humans, most patients and families would gladly accept injections every six months, or even far more frequent treatment.
- Comparisons are drawn to dialysis and diabetes management to argue that repeated medical interventions are acceptable when the alternative is severe disability.
Prevention vs Cure (Exercise, Lifestyle)
- One subthread cites research linking modest weekly physical activity to large reductions in dementia risk.
- There’s frustration that people say they’d do anything for a “silver bullet” while neglecting basic health habits.
- Others push back: these results are about risk reduction, not reversing established Alzheimer’s; prevention and treatment are “apples and oranges.”
Mouse Models, Amyloid Hypothesis, and Likely Effects
- Commenters note prior amyloid-clearing drugs helped mice but not humans, fueling doubt that beta‑amyloid is the core problem.
- A counterargument references work defending the amyloid hypothesis: amyloid may trigger tau pathology, so late amyloid removal might only slow progression.
- Several conclude that even a pure “progression‑slowing” or pre‑symptomatic preventative would still be hugely valuable.
Ethics and Law of Early Human Testing
- Strong debate over why severely ill patients can’t access untested drugs:
- Pro‑access side invokes autonomy (“my body, my choice”) and pre‑consent before cognitive decline.
- Others stress inability to give truly informed consent, legal limits on waivers, risk of extreme harm, and history of scams and negligence.
- Existing pathways for last‑resort or late‑phase experimental therapies are mentioned, but not for totally untested drugs.
Cost, Access, and Incentives
- Some worry that if the treatment isn’t highly profitable, it may stall.
- Others argue governments could justify very large payments or even nationalization, given the massive economic cost of dementia—though the need to fund many failed attempts is highlighted.
- One commenter notes non‑monetary costs of home caregiving, even when no money changes hands.
Alternative and Adjacent Approaches
- Chinese “neck drain”–type interventions and TCM‑related treatments are discussed with heavy skepticism, even by clinicians, due to weak evidence and lack of global adoption.
- Creatine is mentioned as having preliminary, marginal cognitive benefits in early human studies.
- There’s curiosity whether amyloid‑clearing methods could help related conditions like cerebral amyloid angiopathy.
Emotional and Personal Perspectives
- Several describe deep fear of Alzheimer’s and witnessing relatives’ decline.
- A person with normal pressure hydrocephalus shares a powerful story of transient improvement after a spinal tap and the grief of losing that clarity again, used as an analogy for a temporary Alzheimer’s “awakening.”