Twins reared apart do not exist

Scope of the Article and Thread

  • Commenters stress the article is not arguing “genes don’t matter,” but that evidence for very high IQ heritability from “twins reared apart” is weak because:
    • True rearing-apart cases are extremely rare.
    • Key studies (e.g., Minnesota twins work) assumed independent environments that likely weren’t independent.
    • Important data (e.g., on non-identical twins) were omitted or under-emphasized, making strong claims unwarranted.

How Heritable Is IQ?

  • One camp cites traditional twin estimates of ~50–80% heritability.
  • Others argue there is “definitely not” consensus on this:
    • Genome-wide association studies find only ~10–30% heritability from common variants.
    • This gap is the “missing heritability” problem; debate over whether rare variants can close it.
  • Several people emphasize that even 50% heritability yields only modest correlations; genes influence IQ but don’t fix outcomes.

Genes vs Environment, and Misuse of Results

  • Repeated insistence that heritability ≠ determinism: genetic potential, environment, and chance all matter.
  • Some say the core problem is not the studies but how people use them—to justify class, race, or wealth hierarchies and “socially self‑serving conclusions.”
  • Others argue personal observation (children, animal breeding) shows strong genetic influence on personality and cognition, and see skepticism as ideological.

IQ, Success, and Meritocracy

  • Multiple comments link enthusiasm for IQ heritability to:
    • Successful people wanting to see their status as deserved, inevitable, and guilt‑free.
    • High‑test‑scorers using IQ as an identity marker despite limited real‑world success.
  • Pushback: one can acknowledge luck and circumstance without rejecting heritability.
  • Broader meritocracy debate:
    • Some see “meritocracy” as a moral cover for extreme inequality.
    • Others distinguish neutral market pricing from moral “reward” and note misalignment between pay and social value.

Measurement and Cultural Bias

  • IQ tests criticized as heavily influenced by language and cultural exposure, especially vocabulary.
  • Education, family attitudes toward learning, and broader environment are seen as tightly intertwined with measured IQ, complicating genetic inferences.

Blank Slate and Political Framing

  • Several commenters object to “blank slate” strawman accusations; most accept some heritability but dispute its magnitude and social meaning.
  • There is meta‑discussion about bias in social science, ideological pressures on controversial topics, and whether egalitarian beliefs themselves serve a social function.