The Gorman Paradox: Where Are All the AI-Generated Apps?
Where Are the AI-Generated Apps? (Visibility vs Reality)
- Many commenters say AI-built apps do exist but are mostly:
- Internal line-of-business tools (custom CRMs/ERPs, accounting tools, flight school rental systems, infra automation, embedded code).
- One-off “vibe-coded” utilities, scripts, browser extensions and CLIs tailored to a single user or team.
- These rarely hit app stores or public marketplaces, so app-store counts miss most of the impact.
- Others note lots of obvious “AI slop” on the web and in app/game stores (e.g. low-quality Steam games, ugly marketing sites) but agree that high‑quality, widely used AI‑built products are scarce.
What AI Coding Is Actually Good At
- Strong for: scaffolding CRUD apps, parsing common formats, internal dashboards, scripting, refactors, tests, rote API glue, and debugging when guided by an experienced developer.
- Several report large personal speedups (often 3–10x) when they already understand the domain and review/shape the code as it’s written.
Where It Still Fails: The Last 20%
- Major weaknesses:
- Handling messy real-world edge cases (bank CSV quirks, changing APIs, odd hardware, OAuth failures).
- Library/framework churn (e.g. webpack4→5, specific Arduino boards).
- Architecture, long-term maintainability, security, performance, and ops.
- Pattern described repeatedly: AI makes the first 60–80% trivial, then the remaining 20–40% becomes harder because you’re debugging unfamiliar, often bloated code. Sometimes it’s faster to rewrite by hand.
- Rapid codegen can overload code review/QA and generate large amounts of technical debt.
Why No Visible Productivity Explosion?
- Empirical metrics (app stores, some software output graphs) show no obvious inflection; skeptics invoke Amdahl’s Law and Theory of Constraints: speeding up coding (a fraction of the work) doesn’t speed shipping much.
- Demand, attention, distribution and maintenance remain the real bottlenecks; markets are saturated, and shipping something people want is still the hard part.
- “AI-generated” is often seen as a quality/liability red flag, so usage is underreported.
Diverging Narratives About the Future
- Optimists expect exponential capability gains and eventual disruption akin to digital photography.
- Skeptics see unreliable generation, benchmark games, and a hype bubble more like dot‑com/crypto, with limited real productivity so far.
- Broad agreement: current tools are powerful assistants, not autonomous app factories.