Ford F-150 Lightning outsold the Cybertruck and was then canceled for poor sales
Lightning vs Cybertruck: Sales, Scale, and Expectations
- Commenters agree Lightning outsold Cybertruck, but many say that doesn’t equal success:
- If you build for hundreds of thousands of units and sell tens of thousands, it’s a failure regardless of beating Cybertruck.
- Several argue Cybertruck is effectively a low-volume “halo” or sports-car‑like vanity project, while Ford tried to make Lightning a mainstream work truck.
- Tesla’s much higher valuation means it can tolerate a flop better; Ford investors focus on margins and cash flow.
- Some claim Cybertruck has achieved positive gross margins while Lightning never did; others doubt Tesla’s accounting given large unsold inventory.
Why Lightning Was Canceled
- Repeated theme: Lightning was simply too expensive to build for its price:
- Huge, heavy battery; one-off architecture not leveraged across multiple models; tariffs killing cheaper imported components.
- Battery pack alone cited as ~$17k; Ford never reached economies of scale.
- Dealers worsened the situation with big markups early on, turning away would‑be buyers and poisoning the model’s reputation.
- Another factor mentioned: constrained aluminum supply needed for more profitable F‑150 variants.
- Many note Ford is pivoting to an extended‑range EV (EREV) F‑150 that uses a smaller battery plus an onboard generator, seen as more practical for long towing.
EV Trucks: Towing, Range, and Real Use
- Strong consensus that today’s full‑size EV pickups are bad at long‑distance towing:
- Examples: towing heavy trailers can cut range below 100 miles and require frequent, long fast‑charge stops.
- Split opinions on how much that matters:
- Some say most truck owners hardly ever tow or haul and mainly commute or do short‑range errands; for them EV trucks are fine or ideal.
- Others insist “real” truck buyers care about long‑distance towing and will avoid EVs until that’s solved.
- Lightning is praised for:
- Onboard 120/240V power (replacing generators, powering sites/homes).
- Smooth, powerful driving and capability for short‑range work.
- Cybertruck is widely described as “a bad truck” even by truck users: awkward bed, high weight, poor off‑road/towing performance relative to expectations.
Emissions, Carbon, and Energy Mix
- Debate over whether big EV trucks are genuinely greener:
- Some argue BEV vs ICE manufacturing adds ~4 tons CO₂, quickly offset if electricity is renewable.
- Others say trucks like Cybertruck require so much carbon‑intensive manufacturing that they’ll never drive enough tow‑miles to break even.
- Proposals surface for taxing fossil fuels at the true cost of carbon sequestration; frustration that this would “kill the modern economy.”
- Several note coal‑ and gas‑fired generation and diesel backup for data centers complicate the EV climate story.
Design, Status, and the Truck Market
- Cybertruck design is polarizing:
- Many call it ugly, dystopian, unsafe, or a “Homer car”; a few genuinely love the bold, low‑poly look.
- The promise of a tough stainless “exoskeleton” is mocked given panels and trim reportedly falling off and multiple recalls.
- Lightning design criticized for:
- Huge, visibility‑blocking frunk and overall length that doesn’t add bed utility.
- But others like that it looks like a normal F‑150 and shares aftermarket support.
- Long subthread on “lifestyle trucks”:
- Modern US pickups are seen as expensive, oversized, short‑bed luxobarges that signal wealth and ruggedness more than they do work.
- Basic, utilitarian small trucks (90s mini‑trucks, Kei trucks, hypothetical Slate/Telo‑type EVs) are repeatedly held up as what many actually want.
- Counterpoint: many tradespeople do use full‑size trucks as mobile offices and appreciate comfort and high‑end trims.
Politics, Media, and Brand Perception
- Many think Cybertruck’s launch coincided badly with Musk’s increasingly polarizing politics:
- Pro‑EV left‑leaning buyers cooled on Tesla; Cybertruck is visually and culturally tied to Musk, making it feel like a political statement.
- Others insist the main problem is price, range, quality, and missed promises (price nearly doubled vs unveiling, range roughly halved).
- Discussion of Electrek:
- Some see its coverage as clearly hostile to Tesla after changes to referral programs; others say negative reporting simply reflects events.
- Several Tesla owners say they now feel compelled to signal they bought “before Elon went off the deep end,” or regret funding him.
Dealers, Legacy Automakers, and EV Economics
- Strong suspicion that dealer incentives harmed Lightning and other legacy EVs:
- Dealers rely on service revenue; EVs need less maintenance.
- Reports of upsells, markups, or steering buyers back to ICE models.
- Ford’s attempts at direct or hub‑based EV sales reportedly scrapped under dealer pushback and state franchise laws.
- Broader strategic debate:
- Some argue Toyota’s hybrid‑first, EV‑cautious strategy is being vindicated, especially with strong hybrid sales and bungled EV programs elsewhere.
- Others note Toyota’s heavy bet on hydrogen as a parallel misallocation.
EV Misconceptions vs Genuine Constraints
- One camp says misconceptions dominate:
- Most people drive under ~40–60 miles per day and can charge at home, even from a 120V outlet.
- Road‑trip penalties (extra 30–60 minutes over many hours) are framed as acceptable tradeoffs, sometimes even healthier due to forced breaks.
- The other camp stresses real limitations:
- Apartment and dense‑housing residents often lack any overnight charging.
- Rural fast‑charging gaps, cold weather, and heavy use (towing, long‑range work, 600–700 km Autobahn days) are still poorly served.
- Public charging experience is fragmented (multiple apps, broken stations, mismatched connectors, pricing), especially outside Tesla’s network.
- Heavy depreciation of many EVs worries buyers; others frame it as a bargain for used‑EV shoppers who understand battery lifetimes.
What Buyers Seem to Want Next
- Across the thread there’s converging interest in:
- Smaller, cheaper, simpler electric pickups (Maverick‑class, slate‑style mini‑trucks) rather than massive luxury EV trucks.
- Extended‑range EVs or strong plug‑in hybrids with ~80–150 miles electric plus a generator for rare long trips and towing.
- Many see Ford’s future EREV F‑150 and similar concepts as more realistic bridges than pure BEV pickups, at least until batteries and infrastructure improve.