Why I may ‘hire’ AI instead of a graduate student
Ethics of Replacing Students with AI
- Many commenters see the idea as morally wrong, dehumanizing, and embarrassing to state publicly.
- Some argue it reflects a mindset that values productivity metrics over human development and social responsibility.
- Others appreciate the candor: the dilemma is real and worth surfacing even if the conclusion is troubling.
Academic Roles, Teaching vs Research, and Public Funding
- Several note that publicly funded universities have an explicit mandate to teach and develop people, not just produce papers.
- There is debate over whether teaching and research should be decoupled; some say the skill sets differ, others argue effective research training requires active researchers.
- European perspectives (Germany, France, UK) contrast with US-oriented assumptions; in many places, professors are explicitly “research and teaching” staff, not just PI–managers.
Talent Pipeline and Juniors
- Strong concern that avoiding novices will hollow out the pipeline of future senior researchers and engineers.
- Counterpoint: firms and labs can simply poach people trained elsewhere; this already happens.
- Some predict governments or funders may need to mandate or incentivize junior hiring/training, or tie it to grants.
AI Capabilities and Limitations
- Skeptics say current AI is still worse than an average freshman for serious research work, prone to basic errors and hallucinated citations.
- Supporters see enough current utility to meaningfully change workflows, especially for literature search and drafting.
- Many suggest a hybrid model: hire grads and explicitly empower them to use AI, rather than framing it as either/or.
Incentives, Funding, and “Publish or Perish”
- Widely shared view that perverse incentives—paper counts, grants, trendy topics—drive professors toward quick wins and away from long-term mentorship.
- Some hope AI will commoditize paper-writing enough that publication metrics lose importance, forcing better evaluation criteria.
Human Value, Mentorship, and Long-Term Impact
- Commenters stress that students are not just labor; they become future collaborators, carriers of ideas, and a major source of personal fulfillment for academics.
- Several predict that in hindsight, uplifting people will matter more than marginal extra publications.