Sawe becomes first athlete to run a sub-two-hour marathon in a competitive race
Record and Race Context
- Multiple commenters stress how historic this is: first official sub‑2 in a competitive marathon, compared to the earlier controlled-conditions sub‑2 attempt.
- Three men beat the previous official world record in this race; two went under two hours, the third still ran faster than the previous mark.
- Several note how brutal it must feel to run a debut marathon in 1:59:41, beat the old record, and still lose.
Course, Conditions, and Pacing
- London is viewed as a “fast” course with good but not perfect weather; some expect further drops on flatter, colder courses (e.g., Berlin, Chicago).
- Detailed splits show a strong negative split and late-race surges including 5 km segments faster than world-class 5k times and a last mile around 4:12–4:17.
- Discussion of optimal strategy: push harder into the “hard bits” (hills, headwind) rather than coasting downhill, due to wind drag and time-weighted speed.
Technology: Shoes and Nutrition
- Heavy focus on “super shoes”: sub‑100 g Adidas racers with tall foam stacks and carbon plates/rods.
- Cited lab work suggests 2–4% improvements in running economy (~1–2% performance) from these designs.
- Debate over mechanism: foam vs plate, spring-like vs mainly stabilizing; recognition that individual response varies.
- New shoes are extremely expensive and possibly short‑lived; some say they’re only rational for serious racers, others note many amateurs will still buy them.
- Parallel thread on aggressive fueling: gut training to absorb ~90–120 g of carbs/hour, hydrogel drinks/gels, and their adoption from cycling/triathlon.
- Clarifications around calories vs grams, glucose/fructose limits, and whether very high carb intake truly spares muscle glycogen.
Accessibility and Human Performance
- Many compare the record pace (~4:30 per mile, ~17 s per 100 m, ~13 mph) to typical sprint capabilities; most “mere mortals” could not sustain it even briefly.
- Separate debate on how many people could train to a sub‑2‑hour half marathon; some say “almost anyone,” others emphasize age, genetics, injuries, and population realities.
Doping, Purism, and Media
- Some assume top results imply PED use; others push back, citing extensive out-of-competition testing and self-initiated extra testing by the winner.
- Philosophical split: some lament that marathoning is no longer “just about the runner” but about shoes, nutrition science, and data-driven strategy; others argue innovation has always been part of performance.
- Note that mainstream US sports media gave it limited prominence, which some see as mismatched to its historic importance.