Emacs 31 is around the corner: The changes I'm daily driving
Emacs 31 Features & Reactions
- Strong enthusiasm for: auto tree-sitter grammar installation, editable xref, frame layout transposition, and speedbar as a side window.
- Many see auto tree-sitter as removing a major pain point; some had elaborate scripts to manage grammars.
- Some long‑time users admit they’ll upgrade, then mostly keep using Emacs as they always have, trimming configs as built‑ins improve.
Configuration, Distributions, and Presets
- Persistent complaint: too much config needed to get a “modern IDE” experience (tree-sitter, LSP, completion, theming).
- Suggestions: official presets or “profiles” that turn Emacs into a batteries‑included IDE with one setting.
- Others argue Emacs is supposed to be hand‑tuned; prebuilt configs (Doom, Spacemacs, Bedrock, Centaur, etc.) already fill this niche.
- Some users suffer “config bankruptcy” and either adopt Doom/Bedrock or strip back to minimal custom init files.
AI & Agent Integration
- Several users say they briefly switched to VS Code for AI features but came back after getting Claude and other LLM tools working well in Emacs.
- Emacs is praised as ideal for LLM‑assisted editing because it’s text‑configurable; agents can generate/maintain init files, though some warn this reduces understanding of one’s own config.
- Tools mentioned: agent-shell, claude-code-ide, GPT‑related packages, with mixed UX (model switching, missing slash commands, concurrency limits).
Terminal Emulation & Remote Work
- New terminal package Ghostel draws attention: claimed much faster and more capable than vterm, especially for modern TUIs and AI coding tools; links to benchmark numbers and feature comparisons.
- Users highlight Ghostel integration with Claude tools (progress spinners, notifications, hyperlinking).
- Emacs’ TRAMP and emacs‑daemon/emacsclient workflows are cited as long‑standing answers to remote editing and tmux/screen alternatives, though some still prefer VS Code’s remote containers for latency.
Ergonomics, Modal Editing, and Keybindings
- Recurring issues: “Emacs pinky” and wrist pain from modifier chords; common mitigations include remapping Caps Lock to Ctrl, using thumb modifiers, or hardware like Ergodox.
- Extensive debate over modal editing:
- Evil‑mode is widely praised as the best Vim emulation anywhere; some say Emacs “vims better than Neovim.”
- Others reject modal defaults and dislike Doom/Spacemacs keymaps, wanting non‑Evil setups.
- Emacs/readline movement keys are valued across shells, browsers, and CLIs; some note loss or breakage in modern GTK/Firefox/Chrome stacks.
Why People Still Use Emacs
- Long‑time users (decades) say they rely on Emacs as a “toolbox OS” for: coding, org‑mode, Magit, mail, RSS, calendars, note‑taking, spaced repetition, PDF annotation, terminal multiplexer replacement, and even reading Hacker News/Jira/Slack.
- Many value dense, distraction‑free code views and the ability to keep multiple windows/frames and contexts visible simultaneously.
- Some claim Emacs with LSP, tree-sitter, and Magit now rivals or surpasses modern IDEs for their work.
Critiques and Limitations
- Performance complaints: slow startup on macOS, slowness on Windows/macOS without tuning GC/native‑comp, TRAMP latency, and general “jank.”
- One user objects to native compilation and lexical scope changes on security/complexity grounds; another notes pgtk builds currently require native‑comp, which some see as a bug.
- A few say Emacs’ mouse experience and GUI feel are poor compared to mouse‑centric editors/IDEs.
- Others argue that for teams, standardized IDEs still win for out‑of‑box tooling, debuggers, and shared workflows.
Culture and History Notes
- Several nostalgic asides: Emacs’ age, early TECO/Gosmacs days, and infamous salty comments in old terminal.el preserved in a separate “nasty” file.
- Many emphasize Emacs as a rare piece of software that has improved steadily for decades while remaining under user control and highly scriptable.