Daylight Computer – New 60fps e-paper tablet
Display technology & image quality
- Not traditional E‑Ink; it’s a custom monochrome reflective / transflective LCD branded “LivePaper.”
- Uses IGZO, variable refresh (6–120 Hz). Marketed at 60 fps; company says panel can do 120 but software isn’t there yet.
- 190 PPI, 256 grayscale levels, no color. Chosen to increase brightness via larger aperture rather than higher DPI.
- Uses a backlight shining through micro‑perforations in the reflective layer (not a frontlight), aiming for better contrast and unchanged pen feel.
- Not bistable: unlike E‑Ink, it needs power to maintain an image.
- Some users worry about lower contrast vs paper / E‑Ink and about backlight bleed in early videos; company says current production units are improved.
- Comparisons made to Pebble, OLPC, old Palm/Sharp MIP/transflective displays, and recent RLCD monitors.
Hardware, OS & openness
- Android 13 on a MediaTek Helio G99 (midrange SoC), 8 GB RAM, 8000 mAh battery, microSD, Wacom EMR pen, extra mappable buttons, pogo pins.
- No LTE in v1 (cost and certification); no mention of headphone jack in the thread.
- Custom “Sol:OS” is essentially Android with a different launcher and “calm” defaults (e.g., notifications off, potential app‑delay features).
- Bootloader unlock tool is promised so users can flash LineageOS or other ROMs; interest in mainline Linux/postmarketOS; company is open but unsure of resources.
- Some want full open‑sourcing of drivers/firmware; others say an unlockable bootloader may be sufficient.
Performance, battery & use cases
- Early testers report smooth scrolling, PDF zoom, and handwriting, with low ghosting; coding, SSH, terminal, VS Code (remote) and Obsidian seen as viable.
- Example tests: ~67h reading without backlight, ~30h YouTube or reading with some backlight; one engineer reports charging every ~2 weeks with 1–2h/day.
- Tradeoff vs E‑Ink: worse standby life but much higher responsiveness.
Price, positioning & future products
- Price around $729–$800 (includes stylus and some accessories). Many see it as expensive vs iPads, Boox, Supernote; others argue it’s fair for first‑gen, low‑volume custom hardware.
- Strong demand for: external “dumb” monitor version, larger (A4/13") panels, laptop, phone, and Pebble‑style watch using this tech.
- Full refund if users don’t like it; shipping currently limited to select countries, frustrating some.
Website, marketing & trust
- Heavy, scroll‑hijacking site widely criticized; some devices crash or stutter on it.
- Confusion and backlash over initial “e‑ink/e‑paper” framing and one sped‑up demo video; others point to real‑time videos and upcoming third‑party reviews.
- “Blue‑light free” messaging and lack of clear specs/company info on the main page draw skepticism.