A network engineer in search of greener pastures

An early-career network engineer’s struggle to find work in 2024 highlights how tech hiring has shifted toward employer advantage, with degree requirements, security clearances, AI résumé filters and overloaded applicant pipelines shutting out many qualified candidates. Commenters argue that traditional sysadmin and pure networking roles have been hollowed out by cloud adoption and consolidated data centers, pushing practitioners toward DevOps, SRE or security engineering if they want better prospects. Many emphasize that cold online applications rarely succeed today, and that personal networks, referrals and targeted upskilling matter far more than tweaking résumés for automated systems.

State of the Tech Job Market

  • Many argue the market isn’t “broken” so much as shifted sharply toward employers: fewer openings, more applicants, more selectivity.
  • Others say it is broken for everyone: companies waste resources on churn and distrustful hiring that yields frequent departures.
  • COVID-era over‑hiring is seen as having inflated expectations; current conditions feel like a correction.

Network Engineering, Sysadmin, and the Cloud Shift

  • Strong consensus that traditional “rack-and-stack” networking/sysadmin roles have shrunk, especially at startups and cloud‑first companies.
  • Cloud, managed services, Terraform, and “DevOps/SRE who also do networking/security” make dedicated network roles rarer and pushed toward big enterprises, telcos, and data centers.
  • Several suggest the author is under-skilled or underselling skills for modern infra roles and should pivot toward DevOps/SRE/infra/security engineering.
  • Some push back that physical infrastructure and “tinkerers” still matter, just outside FAANG and at lower pay or in non‑tech industries.

Degrees, Certifications, and Professionalization

  • Multiple comments say lack of a degree is a real filter now when supply is high; cert‑only candidates face an uphill battle, especially for advancement.
  • Others note degrees stop mattering much after ~30 if your work history is strong.
  • Debate over whether software/IT should move toward licensing like medicine/law; many oppose licensing as protectionist “cartels.”

Hiring Processes, AI Filters, and Job Boards

  • Automated rejection based on degree or clearance requirements is seen as expected, not necessarily “AI gone wild.”
  • Some report AI/ATS filters wrongly auto‑rejecting strong candidates, even when they were directly invited to apply.
  • Opinions split on tailoring resumes: some find it essential; others say it’s wasted effort in a flooded market.
  • Frustration with Workday-style portals, duplicate data entry, SSN collection, and even required Loom videos; several abandon such applications.
  • One commenter speculates multi-step forms plus resumes might also serve to train AI models.

Networking and the Hidden Job Market

  • Strong theme: most good jobs never hit public boards; referrals/personal networks dominate.
  • Advice: attend meetups, tech talks, conferences; lean on senior contacts; target specific companies directly.
  • Several claim nearly all their roles came via reputation/referrals, not cold applications.

Diversity, Demographics, and Legal/Ethical Concerns

  • Collection of demographic and sexual orientation data is viewed by some as discriminatory and uncomfortable.
  • Others explain it’s legally mandated for larger/federal contractors and should be kept separate from hiring decisions, with “prefer not to answer” always available.
  • Skepticism persists that, in practice, demographic goals might influence decisions despite official rules.

Labor Power and Immigration Policy

  • Some advocate collective political action and stricter enforcement of prevailing wage rules for visas (e.g., H1B) to prevent undercutting wages and to protect domestic workers.
  • Others note any “labor cartel” only works when workers have real scarcity/bargaining power.

Meta: Blog Typography

  • Thread repeatedly criticizes the blog’s original font/contrast as hard to read, especially for dyslexic readers; some liked it as expressive/unique.
  • The author reportedly reverted to a more readable font in response.