Apple to upgrade base Macs to 16GB RAM, starting from Apple M4 models
RAM, Unified Memory, and “Equivalent GB” Claims
- Discussion revisits Apple’s earlier marketing that 8 GB on Apple Silicon equals more on other platforms; many see this as misleading.
- Several comments explain that all modern OSes use memory compression and that “unified memory” (CPU and GPU sharing one pool) is not unique to Apple; modern integrated GPUs work similarly.
- There is disagreement over whether Apple’s architecture significantly reduces memory latency; some say it’s on‑package, not on‑die DRAM, and similar ideas existed in x86 APUs.
- One view credits Apple with notably high memory bandwidth and a genuinely unified, cache‑coherent address space, especially on higher‑end chips.
Is 16 GB Enough?
- Many consider 16 GB a long‑lived “sweet spot” for general use, gaming, and typical dev work, though not ideal for heavy workloads or future‑proofing.
- Some argue 8 GB is “barely acceptable” in 2024 and outright inappropriate on “Pro” models.
- Others report good experiences with 8–16 GB M‑series machines versus older 16 GB Intel Macs.
AI and the RAM Bump
- Several speculate the move to 16 GB base is driven by local AI inference, as small models can consume multiple GB.
- One commenter notes that even if AI uses ~4 GB during use, 16 GB still yields more usable RAM than current 8 GB configurations, and AI won’t run constantly.
- Some worry macOS “AI bloat” will just consume the added memory.
Pricing, Upsell, and Storage
- Strong sentiment that Apple’s RAM and SSD upgrade pricing is “insulting” and functions as a deliberate upsell strategy.
- Soldered RAM/SSD are seen as removing cheaper third‑party upgrades and locking users into high Apple prices.
- Some say these prices have pushed them away from buying Macs entirely.
- Others argue integrated memory and storage help thinness, performance, and bandwidth, so it’s not purely cynical.
- A few want base SSD raised to 1 TB; others say 256–512 GB suffices for non‑media, non‑gaming users.
Reliability and Longevity Concerns
- Repeated worries about post‑2016 MacBooks: soldered components, T2/SSD failures, and USB‑C port issues allegedly leading to catastrophic damage and expensive, often uneconomic repairs.
- Others counter with long‑lived personal and fleet experiences and argue such failures resemble TPM‑related risks on other platforms, not a unique fatal flaw.
- Overall tension between people expecting 8–10 years of service and those accepting 4–5 years as normal.
Other Topics
- Some want an M4 MacBook Air with higher RAM options and Pro‑level displays; others dislike fractional scaling and removed subpixel antialiasing.
- Comparisons to PCs note 16 GB is now common on Windows laptops, and Intel’s Copilot+ branding also starts at 16 GB.