Sleep duration, chronotype, health and lifestyle factors affect cognition [pdf]

Alcohol consumption and cognition

  • Many note the study finds abstainers score lower cognitively than drinkers; this clashes with other research linking alcohol to brain harm.
  • Several argue this is likely confounded:
    • Abstainers may include former heavy drinkers or people who quit due to illness.
    • People with serious health problems or lower income may drink less.
    • Cultural and religious abstinence (e.g., in “dry” cultures) complicates interpretation.
  • Some see weekly moderate drinking as possibly tied to social connections and novelty-seeking, which might track with cognition, but emphasize this is correlation only.
  • Others insist there’s no plausible long‑term cognitive benefit of alcohol, despite these associations.

Sleep duration, quality, and practicality

  • Commenters accept that 7–9 hours is “normal” physiologically, but many say this is hard to achieve with commuting, kids, and modern work.
  • Several report functioning well on 6.5–7 hours and think the 8‑hour target is overstated; others track sleep carefully and find more sleep clearly improves performance and recovery.
  • Some note that very long sleep often coincides with poor sleep quality, prior deprivation, depression, or illness.
  • Confusion that the paper finds little link between subjective sleep quality and cognition; people cite other work and athletic experience where sleep quality strongly affects performance.

Chronotype (night owls vs larks)

  • Night owls in the thread often feel more productive and creative late at night, citing fewer distractions and personal history.
  • Others say they work best in early morning quiet, or that their chronotype shifted with age or kids.
  • Consensus: forcing people to work against their chronotype feels harmful; any cognitive differences may come from social schedules misaligned with biology.

Methodological and interpretation concerns

  • Multiple commenters stress correlation vs causation, “just‑so stories,” and the need to control for ex‑drinkers, health status, exercise, and socio‑cultural factors.
  • Some think mixed findings on alcohol and sleep quality imply subtle or weak effects rather than clear causal stories.

Other factors discussed

  • Personal reports on creatine, caffeine (including “coffee then nap”), nasal breathing, deviated septum, and sleep apnea highlight many unmeasured variables that might affect cognition and sleep.