Health insurers remove executive bios, images from websites after CEO killing
Reaction to the CEO killing
- Many comments describe the killing as shocking, but some argue it feels proportionate compared to deaths caused by denied care.
- A noticeable subset expresses cathartic satisfaction or sees the shooter as a vigilante responding to systemic harm.
- Others criticize this as “ghoulish” and fear copycat attacks and escalation.
Moral and political implications of violence
- Some insist murder should never be condoned; others argue that in a system that kills via denial of care, violent backlash is unsurprising.
- Concern that if the killing leads to reforms, it will legitimize “murder for a cause” and incentivize further political assassinations.
- A few speculate it might become a pretext for gun-control debates, but others doubt gun laws affect well-resourced assassins.
Critiques of US healthcare and insurance
- Strong sentiment that the entire US healthcare system is “fucked,” with insurers seen as central villains: lobbying against nationalized care, inflating prices, and using AI to deny valid claims.
- Multiple comments highlight cynical experiences with denial, delay, and opaque billing; some satire mimics prior-authorization language.
- Others note that insurers profit from high nominal prices because premiums adjust upward plus margin.
Role of providers, pricing, and consolidation
- One line of argument: providers and pharmacies massively overbill, and insurers sometimes pay fully.
- Counterargument: inflated list prices are partly a response to insurer-mandated discounts and administrative burdens.
- Discussion of the ACA’s medical loss ratio rule and how vertically integrated giants (insurer + PBM + clinics/hospitals) may game it via consolidation.
Doctor supply and regulation
- Debate over whether limited physician supply and residency caps (AMA lobbying, residency slot limits, barriers to foreign-trained doctors) drive high prices.
- Some cite rising doctors-per-capita stats, but others note US still lags peers and has specialist/primary-care imbalances and long wait times.
Security of elites and future of assassinations
- Speculation that elite gatherings (G20, Davos) will increase security, though some say they are already fortresses.
- Debate over whether cheap drones will tip offense vs. defense; some emphasize countermeasures, others highlight historical persistence of assassination.
Markets, essentials, and scarcity
- Side debate on whether essentials (healthcare, water, housing, food) should be left to markets.
- Some argue free markets work for non-essentials but are dangerous for life-or-death goods; comparisons are made to kidnapping–for–ransom dynamics.
- Extended tangent on infinite growth vs. physical limits and whether human ingenuity can overcome scarcity.