Itch.io Taken Down by Funko

An automated brand-protection complaint from Funko’s vendor BrandShield led registrar iwantmyname to suspend the itch.io domain over a user-made Funko fan page, briefly taking the popular indie game platform offline. Commenters see the incident as a stark example of how centralized domain infrastructure, overzealous trademark enforcement, and AI-driven abuse reporting can allow false claims to cause major collateral damage. Much of the debate centers on registrar trustworthiness, the legal and practical difficulty of pushing back against such takedowns, and whether stronger accountability for false reports is needed.

Incident and Immediate Cause

  • A fan-made page for a licensed Funko video game on itch.io triggered automated “fraud/phishing” reports from BrandShield, a brand‑protection service used by Funko.
  • Reports went to both host (Linode) and registrar (iwantmyname).
  • itch.io removed the page and disabled the account; Linode accepted this and closed the case.
  • iwantmyname did not respond, and after several days the domain was placed on hold, taking itch.io offline.
  • There is some ambiguity whether the .io registry or the registrar set the hold status; a registrar operator in the thread says “serverHold” indicates registry-level action.
  • After public outcry, the domain was restored; the registrar later claimed they had not seen the earlier response.

Registrar Behavior and Alternatives

  • Many commenters mark iwantmyname as “do not use,” noting it was acquired by Team Internet and has reportedly declined (higher prices, worse support).
  • Several registrars are recommended (Porkbun, Cloudflare, Route 53, OVH, INWX, easyDNS, Hover, NameSilo, Netim, etc.), but nearly all big names attract both praise and horror stories.
  • Gandi is frequently cited as a cautionary tale: acquired by private equity, prices spiked, support and transfers worsened.
  • Some argue for small, local or co‑op‑like registrars, but others point out acquisitions are hard to predict.

Legal Liability and Remedies

  • Multiple commenters see a plausible case for tortious interference or similar civil claims against BrandShield, Funko, and the registrar; others are skeptical.
  • Skeptics argue: contracts typically allow registrars wide discretion; proving “actual malice” or intent is hard; and jurisdiction is messy (US, Israel, New Zealand, UK).
  • There is debate over whether false phishing complaints should be treated as fraud or perjury; consensus is that in practice such abuse is rarely punished.
  • Some suggest complaints to regulators (e.g., FTC) and industry pressure, but cost of litigation is seen as prohibitive for most companies.

DNS Centralization and TLD Issues

  • Discussion emphasizes registrars and registries as central points of failure, despite DNS’s distributed design.
  • Some argue DNS is “as decentralized as you can get”; others distinguish between federated and truly decentralized systems and suggest alternatives like blockchain-based naming.
  • .io is viewed as risky: stories of arbitrary suspensions and concerns about the territory’s political future and ccTLD retirement policies.

AI / Automation in Abuse Handling

  • BrandShield’s marketing around “AI” is criticized; many see this as generic automated keyword scanning misapplied to high‑stakes enforcement.
  • Commenters worry about a pattern: automated systems generating spurious complaints, and risk‑averse intermediaries acting without human review.
  • Some call for legal rules or strict liability for companies deploying such tools, treating “the AI did it” as no defense; others think existing negligence standards should already cover this.

Fan Content, Copyright, and Platform Policy

  • The triggering page was a non‑commercial fan page linking to official material, but many note fan works are always vulnerable to trademark/copyright enforcement.
  • Some think itch.io removing the page mirrors the registrar’s behavior—punishing a user to appease a rights‑holder—but others say sacrificing one page to keep the whole site online is unavoidable.
  • Broader resentment toward aggressive IP enforcement (e.g., Nintendo/Disney examples) and the “corpo hellscape” atmosphere is evident.

Wider Lessons

  • Many see this as another example of “enshittification” post‑acquisition: once‑good infrastructure companies degrading under new owners.
  • Commenters stress the importance of registrar choice, spreading risk (separate registrar and DNS), and having contingency plans (backup domains, alternative hosts).
  • Several note that a single false automated complaint now has the power to erase years of online work overnight, reinforcing fears about platform and registrar dependence.