Show HN: I completed shipping my desktop app
Overall reception
- Many commenters praise the app, UI polish, and the fact it’s a native-feeling desktop app instead of a cloud/SaaS tool.
- Several find it inspiring as a solo-dev project and appreciate the fast-loading website.
- A subset dismiss it as “just another paid FFmpeg wrapper,” but others argue that a good desktop UX on top of CLI tools is real value.
Tech stack & architecture
- App built with Flutter, using SQLite; Next.js is used for the marketing site.
- It relies on FFmpeg and ImageMagick, which are not bundled: on macOS they are installed via Homebrew scripts.
- This design is explicitly chosen to stay on the right side of FFmpeg’s LGPL/GPL licensing.
UX, website, and onboarding
- Landing page is visually appealing but criticized for:
- “Buy now” being very prominent before screenshots or clear value explanation.
- Pricing layout looking like a subscription even though it’s one-time.
- Weak SEO (repeated titles), some grammar issues, unclear download/trial behavior.
- Demo GIFs/videos are seen as too slow, unclear, or broken on some mobile browsers.
- Navigation quirks: tools dropdown doesn’t close or scroll well; some elements look clickable but aren’t.
Pricing & licensing debate
- App is sold as a one-time purchase with lifetime updates.
- Multiple commenters strongly advise against lifetime updates; recommend:
- Per-major-version licenses or one year of updates plus paid upgrades later.
- Heated side-thread on subscriptions vs perpetual licenses, “ownership,” and expectations for long-term maintenance.
Security, distribution & installers
- macOS users are wary of entering their device password; dev points to public install scripts.
- Windows users strongly request a standalone EXE/MSI installer instead of relying only on the Microsoft Store, citing enterprise restrictions, offline use, and “lifetime license” concerns.
- Long subthread on the pain of Windows code signing, EV vs regular certs, and SmartScreen/Defender behavior.
FFmpeg/ImageMagick credit & ethics
- Several argue the site should clearly credit FFmpeg and ImageMagick (beyond a hidden credits page), both for license compliance and ethics.
- There’s a broader philosophical debate:
- One side: charging for a GUI over massive FOSS codebases without visibly acknowledging them feels wrong.
- Other side: licenses permit it; UI/UX, packaging, and distribution are substantial work and deserve compensation.
Feature requests & bugs
- Requests include: Linux version (Flatpak/AppImage), better batch workflows, text overlays/GIF workflows, subtitle tooling, screen recording integration, HEIC/JPEG XL support, lossless editing, GoPro/batch trimming tools.
- Various minor bugs reported in UI, cropping handles, filename collisions, typos, roadmap staleness; dev indicates some are already fixed or being patched.