The Wright brothers invented the airplane, right? Not if you're in Brazil
Competing “first flight” claims
- Commenters list many national claimants: Wright brothers (US), Santos-Dumont (Brazil), Lilienthal and Grade (Germany), Ader and Blériot (France), Pearse (New Zealand), Mozhaysky (Russia), Whitehead and others.
- Several note they were taught different “inventors” in school depending on country, mirroring similar disputes for radio, television, computers, X‑rays, etc.
What counts as an airplane / first flight?
- Key disputed criteria:
- Powered vs. glider
- Heavier-than-air
- Controlled (3‑axis) vs. mere hop
- Sustained vs. very short distance
- Takeoff from level ground under own power vs. rail, hill, catapult, headwind.
- Some argue that if catapults or rails “don’t count,” then many early flights (including Santos-Dumont’s and others) must also be reconsidered.
- Others insist the Wrights’ 1903 flights did not use catapults and met reasonable powered-flight criteria.
Arguments for Wright priority
- Supporters emphasize: development of 3‑axis control, understanding of roll and adverse yaw, wind‑tunnel work to fix bad lift data, efficient propeller theory, and a lightweight engine.
- They stress the Wrights’ exhaustive documentation, witnesses, photographs, and flight distances (kilometers by 1905) versus rivals’ shorter, less-documented hops.
- Replicas of the Flyer reportedly reproduce the documented performance, which many see as strong evidence.
Arguments for Santos-Dumont and others
- Brazil-centered view: Santos-Dumont’s public, unaided takeoffs from wheels in 1906–07, prize-winning distances, and “open source” approach.
- Skeptics question claims that he secretly used Wright-style propellers when Europe allegedly didn’t yet know their work.
Nationalism, education, and narrative
- Many see these disputes as products of national pride and school curricula: countries prefer “their” inventor.
- Several argue the “who invented X?” question is often ill-posed: inventions arise from overlapping, incremental work; crediting a single person oversimplifies.
Patents, secrecy, and impact
- Wrights’ control patents and litigation are said to have slowed later innovation; their secrecy delayed broader recognition, especially in Europe.
- Broader analogies are drawn to the space race, SpaceX, and the steam engine: timing, funding, politics, and narrative can matter as much as strict priority.