GLP-1 therapeutics: Their emerging role in alcohol and substance use disorders

Clinical evidence and interpretation

  • Commenters highlight a key RCT where low‑dose semaglutide reduced alcohol self‑administration and “drinks per drinking day,” but did not reduce overall drinking days or average drinks per calendar day.
  • Some argue the review article overstates this result; others dig into the regression outputs and note how a secondary measure (drinks per drinking day) reached significance while more intuitive aggregates did not.
  • One participant criticizes the whole genre of early‑stage GLP‑1 addiction papers as “speculation,” noting most promising animal or mechanistic results never reach clinical utility.

Anecdotal effects on alcohol and other behaviors

  • Many users report sharply reduced interest in alcohol (or needing fewer drinks), sometimes to the point of near‑abstinence; a few say cravings returned after stopping, others say the change persisted.
  • Several report no change at all in drinking, or only reduced tolerance (getting drunk faster).
  • A striking set of anecdotes describe diminished urges for other compulsive behaviors: video gaming, binge eating, smoking, even gambling; a few report improved executive control (e.g., better poker play, less “tilt”).
  • Others see no mood or addiction benefits beyond weight loss.

Side effects, risks, and negative outcomes

  • Severe GI issues are reported by some: suspected gastroparesis, sulfur burps, fecal vomiting, extreme constipation, and long‑lasting “ravenous hunger” after discontinuation; one account includes retinal problems and major financial/insurance hardship.
  • Others describe increased heart rate, exercise intolerance, and worsened “food noise” after stopping. A few note dose‑ramping strategies or microdosing didn’t prevent serious side effects.
  • Some users experience essentially no side effects and effortless large weight loss; others plateau or find the drug ineffective.

Mechanisms, personality, and “grit” debate

  • Speculation centers on GLP‑1’s impact on reward systems (ghrelin, dopamine, slower gastric emptying reducing reward “hit”).
  • There’s an extended argument over whether using GLP‑1s undermines “grit” and moral development versus simply correcting neurochemical disadvantages, with digressions into free will, Stoicism, CBT/ACT, and privilege.
  • Several worry about personality changes (less drive, creativity, risk‑taking); others counter that treating anxiety, obesity, or addiction inevitably changes personality and can be overwhelmingly positive.

Access and gray‑market use

  • Users describe easy private or online access in multiple countries, high out‑of‑pocket costs, compounding pharmacies, and “research chemical” GLP‑1 analogs (e.g., retatrutide) sourced via peptide sites with ad‑hoc third‑party purity testing.